[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] [SOLVED] domU PXE boot with bridge
Hello. El 13/08/12 11:49, Raj Mathur (ààà ààààà) escribiÃ: Check the thread I have referenced (2012-04-03 08:42 -0500), this question has been raised there.1. Presumably the bridge forward delay is there for a purpose. Can reducing that value result in other problems? Generally speaking: _should_ be no problem.At least I have not encountered any (yet), and nobody has raised his hand to tell he had some. It has mainly to do with STP, which becomes relevant only when there is a ethernet loop risk. In any case, I disable STP on my VM bridges and pay specific attention not to put more than one physical interface in the same bridge, hope that eliminates possibility of looping. In a attempt to prevent surprises, I do not reduce the delay to 0, it is set to something closer to the defaults instead. 5 seems to be just small enough to allow gPXE to do it's job. Not sure if it's a good idea. 15 (the usual default) seems to be as good as 5. Personally, I prefer to leave this kind of things alone: set once, make it persistent, leave it static unless there is a good reason to change it dynamically.2. Is it possible to get the current value of the forward delay from a bridge? If we can do that, we can script a reduced delay when PXE booting and installing a VM, then go back to the default delay after the VM install is over. brctl seems not to offer a _nice_ interface to get the forward_delay value. If you wish to parse a multi-colon output, try "brctl showstp <bridge>". Also, you could check under /sys/devices/virtual/net/*. Greetings. -- Alexandre Kouznetsov _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |