[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] AMD-Vi/Intel VT-d: Passthrough or virtualization?

To: Andrew Bobulsky <rulerof@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Nick Khamis <symack@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 11:50:40 -0400
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zir Blazer <zir_blazer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:52:12 +0000
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xen.org>

>> I got a little less upset about not being able to buy a 2600K, and
>> decided to skip the generation of chips altogether.  But reading that
>> VT-d support will disappear entirely is hopefully too disappointing to
>> be true....  :(

Wait, what?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

References:
- Re: [Xen-users] AMD-Vi/Intel VT-d: Passthrough or virtualization?
  - From: Zir Blazer
- Re: [Xen-users] AMD-Vi/Intel VT-d: Passthrough or virtualization?
  - From: Nick Khamis
- Re: [Xen-users] AMD-Vi/Intel VT-d: Passthrough or virtualization?
  - From: Zir Blazer
- Re: [Xen-users] AMD-Vi/Intel VT-d: Passthrough or virtualization?
  - From: Andrew Bobulsky

Prev by Date: [Xen-users] HVM and PV ACPI
Next by Date: [Xen-users] xen-4 dom0 bridge failed to bring up eth1
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-users] AMD-Vi/Intel VT-d: Passthrough or virtualization?
Next by thread: [Xen-users] FW: AMD-Vi/Intel VT-d: Passthrough or virtualization?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.