[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] some problems to start vTPM vtpm-stubdom



On 07/05/2013 05:10 AM, Xu, Quan wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel De Graaf [mailto:dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:39 AM
To: Xu, Quan
Cc: Ian Campbell; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] some problems to start vTPM vtpm-stubdom

On 06/25/2013 07:52 AM, Xu, Quan wrote:
From: Ian Campbell [mailto:Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 5:16 PM
To: Xu, Quan
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Daniel De Graaf
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] some problems to start vTPM vtpm-stubdom

On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 03:18 +0000, Xu, Quan wrote:
Hi community,
     there are some problems to start vTPM vtpm-stubdom following
docs/misc/vtpm.txt.

You might have better luck getting help with your problems if you CC
the vTPM maintainer as listed in the MAINTAINERS file in the source
tree. I have added Daniel here now.

Campbell,
      Thanks in advance. :)
      More resource will focus on it, my team will try to enable below 3
topics:
1. enable xen vTPM to allow programs to interact with a TPM in a virtual
machine, the same way they interact with a TPM on the physical system.

This should be working for Linux domains (PV&HVM) with the PV driver for
the vTPM.

2. intergrate xen vTPM in openstack cloud. virtual machine in OpenStack can
work with Xen vTPM.
3. promote TPM 2.0 in Xen. Xen vTPM can run on TPM 2.0.

Just curious: do you mean using a hardware TPM 2.0, emulating a TPM 2.0, or
both?

Plan to use both a hardware TPM 2.0 and emulating a TPM 2.0. I know some 
workmates
are developing TPM 2.0 driver.


   When I start vtpm-stbdom, the vtpmmgr-stubdom will print out:
===
ERROR[VTPM]: LoadKey failure: Unrecognized uuid!
69743ae0-9d4a-4ad6-9819-e602085b6792

This is just a message with a bad priority, assuming it's the first time you 
have
started this particular vTPM. Once the vTPM has run SaveHashKey, this should
not appear again for that UUID.

Eventually the TPM Manager will have a management interface used to create
vTPMs, which can be used to provide evidence that a given vTPM's secrets
were created and only available in a given list of configurations.

ERROR[VTPM]: Failed to load key
ERROR in vtpmmgr_LoadHashKey at vtpm_cmd_handler.c:78 code:
TPM_BAD_PARAMETER.
===

[...]
tpm_cmd_handler.c:4113: Debug: tpm_emulator_init(1, 0x00000007)
vtpm_cmd.c:155: Info: Requesting Encryption key from backend
vtpm_cmd.c:164: Error: VTPM_LoadHashKey() failed with error code (3)
vtpm_cmd.c:175: Error: VTPM_LoadHashKey failed

Same error source here; the vTPM will generate new keys and save data once
any command has been processed.

First, I will clean TPM ownership by BIOS.
If the /var/vtpmmgr-stubdom.img is created by below cmd,
    dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/vtpmmgr-stubdom.img bs=16M count=1
it will always print out:
    ~~~
    ERROR[VTPM]: Invalid ID string in disk image!
    ERROR[VTPM]: Failed to load manager data!

Just because it prints out an error does not mean it has failed. After printing
this message, the disk image should be initialized with valid data.

        ~~~
So I use tty linux image instead. Also I will change UUID of tty linux image by 
below cmd:
        uuidgen | xargs -i tune2fs /var/vtpmmgr-stubdom.img -U {}

This is not correct. The disk format for the vtpmmgr stubdom is not ext2,
so you have probably just corrupted the image and caused the errors below.
Stick with zeroing the disk.

now there is another error (ERROR[TPM]: Failed with return code TPM_NOSRK). I 
will continue focus on fixing it.
I think I should create SRK manually by tools.

do you have some suggestion?

The vtpmmgr domain can either take ownership of the TPM on its own (although
the owner auth value is not standard when it does so) or can use a TPM that
has been initialized by the owner (i.e. in Linux).

The below is info when I start vtpmmgr with tty linux image(UUID changed):
[...]
INFO[VTPM]: Waiting for commands from vTPM's:

This message means the TPM manager is ready. I would suggest trying to use
the vTPM before trying to debug harmless error messages.


tpm_data.c:120: Info: initializing TPM data to default values
tpm_startup.c:29: Info: TPM_Init()
tpm_testing.c:243: Info: TPM_SelfTestFull()
tpm_testing.c:39: Debug: tpm_test_prng()
tpm_testing.c:69: Debug: Monobit: 9922
tpm_testing.c:70: Debug: Poker:   17.6
tpm_testing.c:71: Debug: run_1:   2471, 2582
tpm_testing.c:72: Debug: run_2:   1364, 1259
tpm_testing.c:73: Debug: run_3:   616, 588
tpm_testing.c:74: Debug: run_4:   298, 331
tpm_testing.c:75: Debug: run_5:   139, 155
tpm_testing.c:76: Debug: run_6+:  163, 137
tpm_testing.c:77: Debug: run_34:  0
tpm_testing.c:111: Debug: tpm_test_sha1()
tpm_testing.c:157: Debug: tpm_test_hmac()
tpm_testing.c:184: Debug: tpm_test_rsa_EK()
tpm_testing.c:186: Debug: tpm_rsa_generate_key()
tpm_testing.c:191: Debug: testing endorsement key
tpm_testing.c:197: Debug: tpm_rsa_sign(RSA_SSA_PKCS1_SHA1)
tpm_testing.c:200: Debug: tpm_rsa_verify(RSA_SSA_PKCS1_SHA1)
tpm_testing.c:203: Debug: tpm_rsa_sign(RSA_SSA_PKCS1_DER)
tpm_testing.c:206: Debug: tpm_rsa_verify(RSA_SSA_PKCS1_DER)
tpm_testing.c:210: Debug: tpm_rsa_encrypt(RSA_ES_PKCSV15)
tpm_testing.c:214: Debug: tpm_rsa_decrypt(RSA_ES_PKCSV15)
tpm_testing.c:218: Debug: verify plain text
tpm_testing.c:221: Debug: tpm_rsa_encrypt(RSA_ES_OAEP_SHA1)
tpm_testing.c:225: Debug: tpm_rsa_decrypt(RSA_ES_OAEP_SHA1)
tpm_testing.c:229: Debug: verify plain text
tpm_testing.c:261: Info: Self-Test succeeded
tpm_startup.c:43: Info: TPM_Startup(1) ##################


Actually XSM is enabled, 'xl dmesg' can get below info:

XSM is not a requirement for using the vTPM domains, although it is helpful to
provide isolation of the keys contained in the vTPM.

When I try to disable XSM, vtpmmgr is always shutdown with below info, so I 
always enable XSM.

Parsing config from vtpmmgr.cfg
Daemon running with PID 1786
Xen Minimal OS!
   start_info: 0xa3000(VA)
     nr_pages: 0x1000
   shared_inf: 0xdf3d6000(MA)
      pt_base: 0xa6000(VA)
nr_pt_frames: 0x5
     mfn_list: 0x9b000(VA)
    mod_start: 0x0(VA)
      mod_len: 0
        flags: 0x0
     cmd_line:
   stack:      0x5a7a0-0x7a7a0
MM: Init
       _text: 0x0(VA)
      _etext: 0x39854(VA)
    _erodata: 0x46000(VA)
      _edata: 0x48c00(VA)
stack start: 0x5a7a0(VA)
        _end: 0x9adc0(VA)
   start_pfn: ae
     max_pfn: 1000
Mapping memory range 0x400000 - 0x1000000
setting 0x0-0x46000 readonly
skipped 0x1000
MM: Initialise page allocator for b4000(b4000)-1000000(1000000)
MM: done
Demand map pfns at 1001000-2001001000.
Heap resides at 2001002000-4001002000.
Initialising timer interface
Initialising console ... done.
gnttab_table mapped at 0x1001000.
Initialising scheduler
Thread "Idle": pointer: 0x2001002050, stack: 0xd0000
Thread "xenstore": pointer: 0x2001002800, stack: 0xe0000
xenbus initialised on irq 1 mfn 0x207071
Thread "shutdown": pointer: 0x2001002fb0, stack: 0xf0000
Dummy main: start_info=0x7a8a0
Thread "main": pointer: 0x2001003760, stack: 0x100000
"main"
Shutting down ()
Shutdown requested: 3
Thread "shutdown" exited.
INFO[VTPM]: Starting vTPM manager domain
INFO[VTPM]: Option: Using tpm_tis driver
******************* BLKFRONT for device/vbd/768 **********


backend at /local/domain/0/backend/qdisk/1/768
Failed to read /local/domain/0/backend/qdisk/1/768/feature-barrier.
32768 sectors of 512 bytes
**************************
blk_open(device/vbd/768) -> 3
============= Init TPM BACK ================
Thread "tpmback-listener": pointer: 0x20010043f0, stack: 0xf0000
============= Init TPM TIS Driver ==============
IOMEM Machine Base Address: FED40000
Enabled Localities: 0
Map 1 (fed40, ...) at 0x1006000 failed: -1.
Do_exit called!
base is 0x10fcb8 caller is 0x1f0ea
base is 0x10fcd8 caller is 0x284e3
base is 0x10fd88 caller is 0x285b8
base is 0x10fde8 caller is 0x270cc
base is 0x10fe28 caller is 0x270e4
base is 0x10fe38 caller is 0x1bcc9
base is 0x10fe78 caller is 0x6ffc
base is 0x10ff38 caller is 0x3545
base is 0x10ff68 caller is 0x1fc1c
base is 0x10ffe8 caller is 0x343b

Ah, this may be a separate bug - it should work with XSM disabled, assuming
you have the right iomem ranges permitted in your domain configuration.
Enabling XSM seems to be a workaround, if it is a bug.

--
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.