[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Is Xen really a Type 1 Hypervisor?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: RKDTOO <arkady.me@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 02:19:26 +0000
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xen.org>

My apologies; I was merely commenting on this post. Not many people know that the new ESXi (not ESX) console is based on BusyBox, not RedHat.

View this message in context: Re: Is Xen really a Type 1 Hypervisor?
Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

References:
- Re: [Xen-users] Is Xen really a Type 1 Hypervisor?
  - From: RKDTOO
- Re: [Xen-users] Is Xen really a Type 1 Hypervisor?
  - From: Wei Liu

Prev by Date: [Xen-users] I/O virtualisation disabled - ACPI issue?
Next by Date: [Xen-users] VGA Passthrough with Xen 4.3 and Qemu 1.7 on Debian Jessie
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Is Xen really a Type 1 Hypervisor?
Next by thread: [Xen-users] domU fails to reboot if disks use drbd resources
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.