Re: [Xen-users] [Xen-devel] Serious issues with xenpaging

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:51:14PM -0500, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:49:36AM -0500, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Dec 31, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> At 10:33 -0500 on 31 Dec (1388482410), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 06:34:55PM +0000, Russell Pavlicek wrote:
> >>>>> On Twitter, Florian Heigl sent a out a few messages about issues with 
> >>>>> xenpaging:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> 19-Dec: Anyone successfully use 
> >>>>> #xen<https://twitter.com/search?q=%23xen&src=hash> 
> >>>>> #xenpaging<https://twitter.com/search?q=%23xenpaging&src=hash>? docs 
> >>>>> are at SLES manual, rest is mostly this: 
> >>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/255798<http://t.co/P36VdL84Et>
> >>>>>  dead feature or usable?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 22-Dec: @lars_kurth<https://twitter.com/lars_kurth> 
> >>>>> @RCPavlicek<https://twitter.com/RCPavlicek> Hey guys, I wrote down as 
> >>>>> much as I could https://piratenpad.de/p/Ik3lOBLniq1L5TEM   
> >>>>> <https://t.co/e5LQCUD9d0> (since I'm on holiday and not constant online)
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 22-Dec: Yay, tested #xen<https://twitter.com/search?q=%23xen&src=hash> 
> >>>>> Xenpaging (memory overcommit)
> >>>>> [x] largely untested
> >>>>> [x] docs outdated
> >>>>> [x] syntax+logic changed
> >>>>> [x] broken
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> [I've taken the liberty of removing the colorful expletive from the 
> >>>>> final post]
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Is Florian's assessment correct, or is there somewhere we can point him 
> >>>>> for help?  I'm on vacation this week, but if someone replies to me, I 
> >>>>> will try to forward the information appropriately.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The Maintainers file implies otherwise. Let me CC the maintainers.
> >>> 
> >>> Andres really owns this code, so I'll punt to him for an official
> >>> answer, but:
> >> The part actively maintained is the hypervisor support for paging, and the 
> >> interface.
> >> 
> >> tools/xenpaging is one way to consume that interface. It seems to have 
> >> suffered from bitrot.
> > 
> > What is the other interface? Thanks!
> 
> Not sure what the question is. There is one interface. What I was referring 
> to, is that tools/xenpaging implements one specific paging policy: victim 
> selection, rate limiting, paging target, all of these are algorithms that 
> entirely define what bang for your money you will get.
> 

Right, but there is other code that uses this interface as well correct?
Is it available for users ?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users