[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] HTPC + DUAL PC In one


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:27:17 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:27:45 +0000
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xen.org>

On 2014-07-16 11:12, Mattia Carrara wrote:
Hello again Guys. I looked up that HP Microserver, it is pretty cool
and cheap. Now I have a limited budged so i will remain on virtualized
HTPC. Maybe in the future it will be useful.Â

It's cheaper than a decent GPU. :)

Gordan what is a ZFS reciever?

The question was referring to ZFS' send/receive feature. With it
you can easily send and receive file system and volume snapshots
between different machines.

About CPUs, I find on the net some benchmarks:
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1780&cmp[]=1782&cmp[]=2275
[2]
It seems that i7 is more performant than AMDs... But the point is that
using Xen and multiple virtual machines, i'll need more parallel
calculus power, right? So 8 cores would be better? Is it possible that
those benchmarks aren't done using all the eight cores of AMDs? Austin
said that he can reach the calculus power of aÂdual processor Xeon
E3-1286 v3. That's really a goodÂresult. So maybe i should choose
AMD...

How many cores are you going to give to your VMs? You can overbook
CPU cores with Xen, i.e. if you have 8 cores and 3 VMs, you can give
each VM 4 cores and Xen will figure out dynamically which core to
schedule the load on, even though it only has 8 physical cores to
schedule 12 virtual cores plus itself between.



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.