Re: [Xen-users] GPLPV defunct?

["Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And in fact so does KVM: for KVM RedHat signs the Fedora drivers and KVM 
> recommends that all projects which cannot sign drivers use the Fedora ones. 
> That is not really different to using the Citrix ones.


Stephen Oberholtzer wrote:
"
Citrix XenServer has signed drivers, but they only work with XenServer.
"

Is that the case, or are they actually usable on any xen implementation?

If they ARE usable, then it might be helpful to make that fact well
known, since at least some users percieve it differently. In this case
xen is pretty much similar to kvm w.r.t. driver signing situation.

If they are NOT usable, then xen driver situation is pretty much
different from kvm.

-- 
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-users