[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] matching Qemu version to Xen version, how critical?
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Ian Jackson wrote: > Anthony, and Stefano, see below. I haven't investigated at all. > > Mark: I think you are probably fine to use the Debian version. Yes, Ian is right. In the past upstream QEMU didn't do a very good job at applying fixes to stable trees, so I haven't been looking closely for changes there. In fact, it often happened that the qemu-xen stable trees would have more fixes than the corresponding QEMU stable trees. It is very good to see that this has changed. Many fixes were applied to qemu/stable-2.8, that today are not in qemu-xen/stable-4.9. But we can start backporting now. Anthony, would you be up for watching the QEMU stable trees more closely and backporting fixes from there to the qemu-xen stable trees going forward? > Mark Pryor writes ("Re: [Xen-users] matching Qemu version to Xen version, how > critical?"): > > Hello, > > > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/o15OrLa~PY98S3EPm6P-Ag/ > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/877656 > > > > > > on Oct 02, Debian-security released 8 fixes for qemu-2.8. In total there are > > 46 patches since the release of qemu-2.8 on Jul 21. > > > > As shown, in the fpaste, I applied these 46 to the upstream xen-4.9 tarball > > while > > trying to package in Stretch. All applied cleanly. > > > > As a source of qemu fixes xen-4.9, I've looked here: > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=qemu-xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ > > staging-4.9 > > > > you can see there is only 1 fix since the release of xen-4.9.0 (Jun 27). > > > > Any harm in using the debian-delta for qemu fixes? Should these be > > auto-tested > > by xenproject? > > > > PryMar56 > > > > On Thursday, October 5, 2017 3:51 AM, Ian Jackson > > <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > Mark Pryor writes ("matching Qemu version to Xen version, how critical?"): > > > > ... > > > Please tell me it doesn't matter what version of qemu is used with > > > Xen, as long as they are build together. How critical can it be? > > > > > > It's not very critical, if you are using a released version of Xen. > > In particular, if it builds, you're unlikely to go very far wrong. > > > > NB though that (as you suggest from "built together") the Xen control > > libraries that qemu uses 1. do not have a stable ABI until recently > > (sorry) 2. do not have a stable interface to the hypervisor. > > > > So unless you are using the very latest bits, you must rebuild when > > you use a different Xen version. > > > > Additionally, the qemu configure script works by determining the Xen > > version (rather than by looking for individual features) and keying > > everything off that. So if you are using xen-unstable, you will find > > that some qemu versions don't build. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |