Re: new Cohttp interface progress

[Jonathan Ludlam <Jonathan.Ludlam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6 Aug 2012, at 23:53, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:

> 
> You could also build a version of IO.M that uses native threads (where type t 
> would be a dummy type and not actually hold any state).
> 

I bet this would introduce all sorts of problems because you no longer can 
assume that a block of code with no IO.bind in will run atomically. I'm sure 
I've seen a few places in the code that make that assumption.

Jon