|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [MirageOS-devel] Mirage on Xen/ARM status
On 16 Jun 2014, at 11:26, Thomas Leonard <talex5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> A few random notes: >>> >>> - Lack of progress reports from mirage is a problem on x86, but it's >>> worse on ARM because it's so much slower. >> >> Yes, this one has a bug open on mirage/mirage. We need to tee the output >> from the tool really. > > [ https://github.com/mirage/mirage/issues/205 ] This is addressed in the forthcoming Mirage 1.2.0 tool, with the pull req being tested in: https://github.com/mirage/mirage/pull/252 The main difference is that `mirage` no longer calls OPAM directly. It just generates a Makefile with a `make depend` target that does the honours, so it can be called explicitly. It also exports OPAMVERBOSE and OPAMYES from the Makefile, so it's easier to override it if quiet output is needed instead. I'll probably release Mirage 1.2.0 tomorrow with this change unless anyone finds an issue. I anticipate that the only fallout will be Travis scripts that need to have a "make depend" inserted somewhere. -anil _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |