Re: [MirageOS-devel] mirage os on cubietruck nand detection

[Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx>]

They all use a forked kernel. Given how new Xen ARM is, I'd be surprised if an old 3.4 dom0 branch worked without issue. It's probably easier to forward port the NAND support to the 3.17 Linux tree.

On 5 Aug 2014, at 11:52, Gilles DALMAS <gdalmas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

However, Cubian and other images, provided on the site of cubietech, handles very well this feature.
I'm going to ask this question on their website to find out what changes they made to manage the nand.

 

 

> Message du 05/08/14 10:32
> De : "Vincent B." <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> A : mirageos-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [MirageOS-devel] mirage os on cubietruck nand detection
>
> On 04/08/2014 15:53, Gilles DALMAS wrote:
> > In terms of the nand, on page:
> > https://github.com/igorpecovnik/Cubietruck-Debian/blob/master/config/kernel.config.3.4.61
> > there is for example the line CONFIG_SUNXI_NAND_PARTITION = y and this is the
> > 3.4.61 version of the kernel, how is it that this option does not appear in the
> > following versions of the kernel? if I add it manually in the config file, is it
> > processed?
> >
>
> There is no sunxi NAND support yet for the mainline linux Kernel. Work is
> ongoing, though.
>
> Vincent
>
> _______________________________________________
> MirageOS-devel mailing list
> MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
>

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel