Re: [MirageOS-devel] TLS deployments/feedback needed

[Hannes Mehnert <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA384

On 05/20/2015 17:01, Mindy wrote:
> Good news or bad news, depending on how you slice it: running the 
> extremely naive test script below:
> 
> ``` for i in `seq 1 2000`; do curl -1 -k https://192.168.3.2
> >/dev/null; done ```
> 
> against a unikernel generated with mirage-seal results in the
> following:

if instead of invoking the cohttp dispatch (generated by mirage-seal),
responding with a static string, does the same issue happen?


hannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=dD+Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel