Re: [MirageOS-devel] How to implement protocols?

[Nik Sultana <ns441@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2015-11-14 11:48, Daniel BÃnzli wrote:
> Le vendredi, 13 novembre 2015 Ã 16:37, Anil Madhavapeddy a Ãcrit :
> > One of the design goals of Cohttp was to allow multiple, completely 
> > independent network stacks (including sockets and direct stacks) to 
> > run within the same program.
> That doesn't mean that you *have* to use functors.
>
> > Where functors fall over is the terrible documentation and tooling 
> > assistance when faced with using one, and this is being addressed by 
> > codoc and Merlin.
> This is not the issue, please see the linked presentation.
>
> > > Other than that the document feels like unstructured, poorly written [1], 
> > random rumblings.
> > Grumpy day, eh?
> Au contraire, that was a superb day. I stand behind this comment, it
> just felt like reading an undergraduate essay.
[snip]

Then there's an opportunity for people to chip in and improve it 
constructively. I think Hannes ought to be supported for his initiative. 
It's a start. Hardly anything's perfect from the start. Despite 
technical shortcomings, undergrads tend to be polite in their essays.
_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel