[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [MirageOS-devel] Many-core ARMv8, Mirage & Networking
Thanks Anil, That board looks like a great way to get a 64bit ARM dev environment. It seems as though it has been popular, HardKernel have run out! I agree that UKVM + Solo5 seems to be the most direct way to unlock the upper layer that I’m interested in. I’ve read through the issue you mention below. The deep knowledge of ARM virtualisation seems like quite a high bar to entry, but I’ll try to help if/where I can. Thanks, Chris > On 7 Feb 2017, at 12:11 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dear Chris, > > In addition to Nik's very useful reply, you may also be interested in some > UKVM work that will finally connect the dots and provide an end-to-end ARM64 > unikernel based on Solo5: > > https://github.com/Solo5/solo5/issues/151 > > Any contributions there would be most welcome, as once that exists, several > of the older projects such as Jitsu, and newer projects such as FLICK, could > be brought up to speed with the Mirage 3 module types and APIs. I recommend > the ODroid C2 as a pretty portable ARM64 box to take to the hackathon :) > > regards > Anil > >> On 3 Feb 2017, at 03:02, Chris Fegan <cfegan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Folks, >> I've been reading a lot of this group's research papers in preparation for >> Marrakech. I think >> I'm getting a sense for how the various pieces fit together. >> >> The reading has lead me to wonder if there is a "master plan" for linking >> MirageOS, FLICK, many-core ARMv8 & >> SR-IOV. It seems as though a stack something like the below would be a great >> substrate for building high performance and flexible network applications >> (that look at the packet payloads, not just headers). >> >> Jitsu >> FLICK >> Mirage >> Solo5 >> Microkernel | Hypervisor [seL4]|[KVM] >> Cavium many-core ARMv8 SoC with Ethernet fabric >> >> Besides the question about the existence of a master plan. >> * Are the Flick tools available in source code to study? >> * Do you think that Flick will need to remain outside of the Mirage & OCaml >> ecosystem to make use >> of multicore & DPDK or can you see a path bring it "into the fold"? >> >> [Flick] >> https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc16/atc16_paper_alim.pdf >> [seL4] https://ts.data61.csiro.au/projects/TS/realtime.pml >> [KVM] http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page >> [Cavium] http://www.cavium.com/ThunderX_ARM_Processors.html >> >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> MirageOS-devel mailing list >> MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel > _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |