Re: [MirageOS-devel] Permission to Absorb mirage-http

[Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 25 May 2017, at 07:03, Rudi Grinberg <rudi.grinberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> As you all know, the recent switch to jbuilder makes it far easier to
> maintain multiple opam packages out of a single repo. So this is a
> chance to re-evaluate some of the repository organization decisions made
> earlier on.
> 
> One such example is mirage-http [1]. This is a library that is tightly
> bound to the internals of cohttp and provides the same kind of
> functionality that cohttp does itself. Moreover, it doesn't have any of
> its own documentation. That suggests that it fails to meet the bar for
> its own git history. Therefore, I propose that we simply move it back to
> the main cohttp repository. Note that I will preserve mirage-http's git
> history in this process.

I agree.  There is also 

_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel