[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Publicity] Reblogging Luis' piece on oxenstored


  • To: publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:54:46 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:54:52 +0000
  • List-id: "List for Xen Publicity, PR and events" <publicity.lists.xenproject.org>

On 29/04/2014 15:45, Dario Faggioli wrote:
Hello publicity folks,

On gio, 2014-04-17 at 11:28 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 11:20 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
My main question is, why?  The paper in question was published in 2009;
oxenstored has been the default for 5 years now.
Has it really been 5 years?

It's the default iff you have the ocaml compiler installed at build
time, which I wager many people don't, so it's probably not as widely
used as you might expect. Raising the profile of it doesn't seem like a
bad thing to me.

Any other views on this? Should we blog about this or not? If yes, it
would be a nice piece for this week...
I don't have an issue. Maybe set a little bit of context at the beginning pointing to Luis blog, and maybe a little bit of history
Lars


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.