Re: [Publicity] Blog article: "PV Calls: a new paravirtualized protocol for POSIX syscalls"

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you, and good points: I added a diagram and "higher is better" in
bold near the graphs.

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Lars Kurth wrote:
> I think this is very good. The post would benefit from an architecture 
> diagram. For example it is not clear to me in which execution context (OS) PV 
> Calls is intended to be used. Maybe it does not matter.
> 
> On the benchmarks: it would probably help to explain whether higher or lower 
> is better
> 
> Lars
>  
> > On 19 Aug 2016, at 02:22, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I wrote a blog article on PV Calls, which is a good complement for the
> > Xen Developer Summit talk:
> > 
> > https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=11468&preview=true
> > 
> > Let me know what you think, feedback is welcome.
> > 
> > With the Summit coming soon, I don't know when is the right time to
> > publish it. If you like it, feel free to schedule it for publication on
> > the day you think is best.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Stefano
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Publicity mailing list
> > Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity
> 

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity