Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM

[Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 22, 2004, at 7:22 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Anyway - currently sounds like teh bug resides in the most complex
> half of the most complex driver. Who'd've thought it? ;-)
At this point this data is surely redundant but...

When I went to sleep last night I let my box run dom0 and four VMs 
doing md5sum checks on a couple of large files, hammering the heck out 
of the block i/o drivers and CPU but with all the ifaces/vifs on the 
machine down.  When I woke up, all compares had been correct for the 
six hours or so it ran.  I re-upped the ifaces and started to ping dom0 
and the VMs and within a minute of the pings starting dom0 started to 
report incorrect md5sums.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"We all enter this world in the    | Support Electronic Freedom
same way: naked; screaming; soaked |        http://www.eff.org/
in blood. But if you live your     |  http://www.anti-dmca.org/
life right, that kind of thing     |---------------------------
doesn't have to stop there." -- Dana Gould



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel