[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] question on frontend ethernet
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Ian Pratt wrote: > I'm not sure it's worth going to the extent of having /proc entries that > provide this when it's pretty easy just to knock up a little application > that uses priv_cmd to fetch it, e.g. to write core dumps. (I think > someone may have already done this?) actually, I'll get picky and say this is not how Plan 9 really works. In Linux and other Unix-like systems, stuff like sysfs and proc etc. are add-ons and the drivers have to get engaged in making entries in /proc. You can have a driver that has no proc or sysfs entries. In Plan 9, the fact that devices (including proc) look "like a file" is integral to the overall operation of the system. It's very attractive once you get used to it, to say the least. I keep getting mad at Linux because it feels so primitive; reminds me of the good old days when I got mad at OSes that weren't as good as Unix ... oh well, enough ranting :-) ron ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |