[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 2.0 beta
I have the same issue here. I'm just recompiling everything from scatch just to make sure I haven't got some old stuff in there somewhere. On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:23, James Harper wrote: > I get screenfulls of this message when trying to boot xenU: > > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -472618592 > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -471563592 > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -470508592 > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -469454592 > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -468375592 > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -467313592 > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -466252592 > > xen0 works fine. > > it also doesn't appear to boot but with all those messages it's hard to > tell why. > > James > > > > > From: Ian Pratt > Sent: Sat 28/08/2004 8:38 AM > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 2.0 beta > > > Folks, > > There have been some pretty significant checkins to the unstable > tree today: > > First off, we've made it so that by default 'make world' builds a > Linux 2.6.8.1 kernel rather than 2.4.27. I know a lot of people > still use 2.4, but I think its important the 2.0 release is > "2.6 native". > > Secondly, a number of important MMU optimisations have just been > enabled in the 2.6.8.1 tree. Performance should now be as good as > 2.4. We've done a fair bit of testing, but should you have > problems, it would be useful to know if you can repeat with > CONFIG_WRITABLE_PAGETABLES disabled in the linux kernel. > > I've created a new xen-2.0.bk tree on xen.bkbits.net which is > where the source for the 2.0 release will live. For the next few > weeks we expect this tree to simply be a time-lagged version of > the xeno-unstable.bk tree: bug fixes will get road tested in the > unstable tree then pushed to 2.0 if no problems are reported. > > To clone the proto 2.0 tree use "bk clone bk://xen.bkbits.net/xen-2.0.bk" > > NB: We've named the repository 'xen' rather than 'xeno' as the > latter name no longer makes sense now that the XenoServer project > now lives in a different repository. > > We'd be grateful if as many people as possible could test this > beta over the next few days, so we can shake out any bugs before > the official 2.0 release, hopefully next week or so. > > Thanks, > Ian > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |