[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 2.0 beta



I have the same issue here. I'm just recompiling everything from scatch just 
to make sure I haven't got some old stuff in there somewhere.

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:23, James Harper wrote:
> I get screenfulls of this message when trying to boot xenU:
>
> Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -472618592
> Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -471563592
> Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -470508592
> Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -469454592
> Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -468375592
> Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -467313592
> Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -466252592
>
> xen0 works fine.
>
> it also doesn't appear to boot but with all those messages it's hard to
> tell why.
>
> James
>
>
>
>
> From: Ian Pratt
> Sent: Sat 28/08/2004 8:38 AM
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 2.0 beta
>
>
> Folks,
>
> There have been some pretty significant checkins to the unstable
> tree today:
>
> First off, we've made it so that by default 'make world' builds a
> Linux 2.6.8.1 kernel rather than 2.4.27. I know a lot of people
> still use 2.4, but I think its important the 2.0 release is
> "2.6 native".
>
> Secondly, a number of important MMU optimisations have just been
> enabled in the 2.6.8.1 tree. Performance should now be as good as
> 2.4. We've done a fair bit of testing, but should you have
> problems, it would be useful to know if you can repeat with
> CONFIG_WRITABLE_PAGETABLES disabled in the linux kernel.
>
> I've created a new xen-2.0.bk tree on xen.bkbits.net which is
> where the source for the 2.0 release will live. For the next few
> weeks we expect this tree to simply be a time-lagged version of
> the xeno-unstable.bk tree: bug fixes will get road tested in the
> unstable tree then pushed to 2.0 if no problems are reported.
>
> To clone the proto 2.0 tree use "bk clone bk://xen.bkbits.net/xen-2.0.bk"
>
> NB: We've named the repository 'xen' rather than 'xeno' as the
> latter name no longer makes sense now that the XenoServer project
> now lives in a different repository.
>
> We'd be grateful if as many people as possible could test this
> beta over the next few days, so we can shake out any bugs before
> the official 2.0 release, hopefully next week or so.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.