Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 2.0 beta

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If you didn't rebuild xenU then you will probably see time not
working. I slipped in a cleanup to the time interface before the 2.0
release :-)

 -- Keir

> I have the same issue here. I'm just recompiling everything from scatch just 
> to make sure I haven't got some old stuff in there somewhere.
> 
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:23, James Harper wrote:
> > I get screenfulls of this message when trying to boot xenU:
> >
> > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -472618592
> > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -471563592
> > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -470508592
> > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -469454592
> > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -468375592
> > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -467313592
> > Timer ISR: Time went backwards: -466252592
> >
> > xen0 works fine.
> >
> > it also doesn't appear to boot but with all those messages it's hard to
> > tell why.
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ian Pratt
> > Sent: Sat 28/08/2004 8:38 AM
> > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 2.0 beta
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > There have been some pretty significant checkins to the unstable
> > tree today:
> >
> > First off, we've made it so that by default 'make world' builds a
> > Linux 2.6.8.1 kernel rather than 2.4.27. I know a lot of people
> > still use 2.4, but I think its important the 2.0 release is
> > "2.6 native".
> >
> > Secondly, a number of important MMU optimisations have just been
> > enabled in the 2.6.8.1 tree. Performance should now be as good as
> > 2.4. We've done a fair bit of testing, but should you have
> > problems, it would be useful to know if you can repeat with
> > CONFIG_WRITABLE_PAGETABLES disabled in the linux kernel.
> >
> > I've created a new xen-2.0.bk tree on xen.bkbits.net which is
> > where the source for the 2.0 release will live. For the next few
> > weeks we expect this tree to simply be a time-lagged version of
> > the xeno-unstable.bk tree: bug fixes will get road tested in the
> > unstable tree then pushed to 2.0 if no problems are reported.
> >
> > To clone the proto 2.0 tree use "bk clone bk://xen.bkbits.net/xen-2.0.bk"
> >
> > NB: We've named the repository 'xen' rather than 'xeno' as the
> > latter name no longer makes sense now that the XenoServer project
> > now lives in a different repository.
> >
> > We'd be grateful if as many people as possible could test this
> > beta over the next few days, so we can shake out any bugs before
> > the official 2.0 release, hopefully next week or so.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel