Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxen-3.0 (libxc rewrite)

[Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 11:25 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 09:55 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > gcc4 is still a bit off and I imagine that Pyrex will be updated as 
> > needed.  If it ever proves to be painful to deal with, I'll break down 
> > and add bindings by hand.  Does that seem like a reasonable plan moving 
> > forward?
> 
> gcc4 isn't that far off.  It's in the Fedora development tree and we're
> using it to compile everything now.  See Rik's multiple patches to fix
> warnings that pop up with gcc4.  And counting on Pyrex being fixed based
> on the complete lack of response to questions on this topic may be
> wishful thinking.  Maybe I'll look at Pyrex a little this afternoon and
> see if I can figure out how to fix what it's doing.

Okay, I got Pyrex happier with gcc4 and sent that patch off this
afternoon, so that's not an argument against it at this point.

I guess it's down to the aesthetics of binding generators, which since
I'm not really a fan of any of them, I won't argue much about between
the evils.

Jeremy



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6882&alloc_id=15148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel