[Xen-devel] Please pull xeno-unstable-ia64.bk (now includes VT-i support)

["Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>]

Non-VTI testing passed and I have merged in latest
xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable changes and tested
that too (non-VTI).

Keir, please pull

bk://xen-ia64.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable-ia64.bk

into the xeno-unstable tree.

Congratulations to the Intel team for reaching this milestone!

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arun Sharma [mailto:arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 11:49 PM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Rebased xen-ia64 tree with 
> VT-i support
> 
> Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> > So, go ahead and merge it into
> > xen-ia64.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable-ia64.bk.
> > Please make sure you merge in my latest changes (yesterday)
> > which are necessary to accommodate recent changes by Keir in
> > the main Xen source tree.  When that is done, let me know and
> > I will give it one final compile/run test and then get Keir
> > to pull it up into xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable.bk.
> > 
> 
> I just pushed some changes to xeno-unstable-ia64.bk. They add support 
> for the Intel Vanderpool technology for Itanium processor 
> family  (VT-i).
> 
> CONFIG_VTI is disabled by default and needs to be explicitly 
> turned on 
> in Rules.mk for those interested in trying it out and having 
> access to 
> VT-i capable hardware.
> 
> I also checked in something equivalent to the pci-ioapic 
> patch for ia64 
> and removed swiotlb.c (because Xen will not be involved in PCI DMA).
> 
>       -Arun
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel