[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Control tools work
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:56:54AM -0600, Charles Coffing wrote: > > [1] I think I'll make the control pipe and error/progress reporting > > filehandles function call arguments to make it easier to use > > {save,restore} when you link libxc into your application. > > Although I really think you want to run these in a seperate process to > > isolate them from your main application. If there's real demand we > > could bring back something like ioctxt to give you callbacks for > > control/error/progress. > > Is there a specific reason you suggest running these in a separate > process? I'm wondering if this is just a general preference because > isolation tends to be a good thing, or if you suspect, say, a > maliciously crafted domain could somehow crash the domain builder > function. I suspect not all error paths to be well tested. christian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |