[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Parallax or LVM?
- To: Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 02:52:43 +0900
- Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:51:53 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qz0mJ8/qFnrC6uOE/xKXkFcI7mk+cMI3wxTAAY7wojdZin+Pop+FywReCFtEgYd+21yclebEGr03ouGDn4lkd00kxgdKzLbEpOCI98I1qGJSD4NU6Et7Wd99Wuf2E5IGYYLznhUeamInCRYoIuQCTZsMw/3ZQrJo6UHJttauqx4=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
hello,
Parallax is in -unstable short time ago. So in the future we can do
CoW using it, provided it is stable enough. Should I still use LVM?
regards,
aq
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
