Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64's contig_initmem_init

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 30 Aug 2005, at 14:19, Jan Beulich wrote:

> Finally I wonder why this first Mb was taken care about, but the
> potentially larger area at the end of the initial allocation (which to
> my understanding is currently lost, too) wasn't. And I am having the
> understanding that the respective memory ranges for i386 are also lost.
x86_64 now completely unmaps low 1MB from the initial mapping area at 
end of extend_init_mapping(). I don't think any memory is now lost in 
either i386 or x86_64 (i386 already freed up the low 1MB).
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel