Re: [Xen-devel] /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch?

[Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:36 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2005, at 03:07, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> > Exactly!  So you would have me implement multiplexing code in the
> > kernel, demultiplexing code in the daemon, checking code in the kernel
> > to make sure we don't corrupt the shared comms channel, for no reason.
> 
> Better to implement simple mux/demux code than pain-in-the-arse 
> save/restore code.

But but but... it doesn't *help*.  That's the entire point!

OK, please describe, in simple terms, why you think save/restore is
different if we multiplex across a single transport?

Rusty.
-- 
A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel