[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Get notified on unbind_evtchn?

To: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: NAHieu <nahieu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 01:25:24 +0900
Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:23:06 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=HLJRq3T/UO1laM/9FqtxOzZz7cRi//UUhzKREwm8it3ePYNolYKL030/jfLsFQiVpDzyutf5NsLONH8xNvLfbwwMgHTCridjo5UK0G+IbN2EvugxDUibUolngM/fsD9tLoiLrYsLVU6Ia7yfOyiLdb5mve5jVkROucEFJJEH0uY=
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hi,

When domU and dom0 bind to evtchn, if one unbind the channel (for
example with unbind_evtchn_from_irqhandler() ), does the other side
get aware of the event?

I imagine in that case, the other side will somehow get notified, is
that correct? If so, how can we intercept that notify?

Thank you.
Hieu

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Get notified on unbind_evtchn?
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] stop_this_cpu disable_local_APIC, wild xm list output
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] mini-os (not a cross post)
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Wed Oct 5 10:15:50 2005 +0100 072fb38810a6
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Get notified on unbind_evtchn?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.