RE: [Xen-devel] dom0_shadow=1

["Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>]

Gerd Knorr wrote:
>    Hi,
> 
>> Is this supposed to work?
> 
> Oh, and btw, trying to use the "new" shadow code for 32bit non-pae
> doesn't even compile.  Is nobody testing that?  Wasn't the plan to use
> the new code everythere some day?  What is the status of that?

Gerd, Hi

We've been working on shadow.c to get/restore log-dirty mode for PAE and
x86_64. It's basically start working, and doing more tests. The plan is
to support 3-level and 4-level in shadow.c for now (for 3.0), and merge
2-level to shadow.c. 

> 
> cheers,
> 
>    Gerd
> 
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile     Wed Oct 19 10:53:00 2005
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile     Fri Oct 21 16:24:46 2005
> @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
>    ifneq ($(pae),n)
>     OBJS += shadow.o shadow_public.o     # x86_32p: new code
>    else
> -  OBJS += shadow32.o                   # x86_32: old code
> +  OBJS += shadow.o shadow_public.o     # x86_32: new code
> +#  OBJS += shadow32.o                  # x86_32: old code
>    endif
>   endif
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel