[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen Virtual Framebuffer
Jon Smirl wrote: I added a section to the Wiki page for discussion of various approachs and the pros/cons. Feel free to extend this information.On 12/5/05, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I like Xnest quite a lot. We need something that's available when X isn't though (for the VT console for instance). You certainly don't have to run X on /dev/fb0. It's mostly to make text-mode and distro installation a whole lot more user friendly.Can't distro install into a domain be handled on a virtual serial line and Linux terminal emulation? This seems like a lot of work to go through to get something like Redhat's graphical boot working. So far, the framebuffer has not been all that much code (only a few hundred lines) so I think the benefit from the increased usuability is well worth it. Thanks for the feedback, Anthony Liguori Regards, Anthony LiguoriHowever, using remote X is a good option for a number of use-cases so it's certainly appropriate for certain environments. Regards, Anthony Liguori Jon Smirl wrote:I haven't tried playing with X and Xen, but why doesn't it work to just treat the multiple domains like a network? You run X in dom0 and give it full access to the video hardware. Then you ssh into each domain and start X apps, just like you do when using X remotely. OpenGL will even work this way and be accelerated (as soon as X fixes indirect acceleration). This model should let you get apps up from each domain simultaneously on the X display in dom0. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |