|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] pfn_pte/pfn_pmd
Apparently it's not, as the translation is done in __pte (and not in __pte_ma); I was just getting confused by the two different mechanisms use for non-PAE and PAE, which, while merging, I'd like to get to use as much unconditional code as possible. I still wonder, however, whether the BUG()/panic() in PAE's pfn_pmd() couldn't be removed... Jan >>> "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> 21.12.05 11:44:31 >>> Isn't it a bug to have pfn_pte be defined identically as pfn_pte_ma in i386's pgtable-2level.h? Shouldn't this rather be done the same as in pgtable-3level.h? Similarly for pfn_pmd (which BUG()-s in pgtable-3level.h)... Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |