[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:37:45 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:48:52 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

While there has been a new (conditionalized) call to 
del_singleshot_timer_sync() added, the old instance hasn't been
deleted (other than the parallel atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0)). Is this 
intentional? If so, how is this supposed
to work?

Thanks, Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question
  - From: Stefan Berger

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][XM-TEST] Test for bug #533
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen-HVM Builds
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Question about monitor_table
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.