Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question

[Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/14/2006
11:37:45 AM:

> While there has been a new (conditionalized) call to 
> del_singleshot_timer_sync() added, the old instance hasn't been
> deleted (other than the parallel atomic_set(&chip->data_pending,
> 0)). Is this intentional? If so, how is this supposed
> to work?

This has most likely been introduced during the recent
merging with newer kernel trees.

-- Stefan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel