Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] VMI for Xen?

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 17 Mar 2006, at 00:10, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> > That's near meaningless, as it's not something that would compile and
> > run, but gives you a scope of the size of the changes for domU only
> > (shadow mode), no Xen drivers, etc..
> Okay, but that is on par with the amount of changes present in VMI.  
> That's a really interesting data point.
Omitting the Xen drivers will account for a fair bit of that reduction. 
Including those in the VMI comparison is unfair since the VMI 
interfaces consider core architectural subsystems, not I/O.
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel