[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching

[Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Anthony Liguori (aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Would you have less trouble if the "ROM" were actually more like a 
> module?  Specifically, if it had a proper elf header and symbol table, 
> used symbols as entry points, and was a GPL interface (so that ROM's had 
> to be GPL)?  Then it's just a kernel module that's hidden in the option 
> ROM space and has a C interface.

Yeah, point is the interface is normal C API, and has the similar free
form that normal kernel API's have.

thanks,
-chris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel