[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching

* Anthony Liguori (aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Would you have less trouble if the "ROM" were actually more like a 
> module?  Specifically, if it had a proper elf header and symbol table, 
> used symbols as entry points, and was a GPL interface (so that ROM's had 
> to be GPL)?  Then it's just a kernel module that's hidden in the option 
> ROM space and has a C interface.

Yeah, point is the interface is normal C API, and has the similar free
form that normal kernel API's have.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.