[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Assertion '! IS_INVALID_M2P_ENTRY(gpfn)' failedkillsmachine
Keir Fraser wrote: > On 29 Mar 2006, at 17:09, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > >> Are you doing live migration? In the default setup for domUs, the >> shadow code is never used. > > The mini patches for Linux we submitted to lkml depend on shadow mode. > > -- Keir > So this is _not_ for 3.0.2? I expect some hiccups with that if domUs start using other than log-dirty mode (e.g. SHM_translate). For this particular bug, I think the P2M table is missing the mapping for the xenpage_list. We'll take a look at that. For PAE or x86-64, although xenlinux uses subset of the shadow sub-modes, I guess we have more bugs with domUs simply because we haven't tested (we have higher confidence with log-dirty mode for domU live migration). HVM guests have been tested well, and they use the shadow mode combined with SHM_external (which domUs don't). Jun --- Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |