[Xen-devel] Re: Is teardown_irq still required?

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6 Apr 2006, at 04:14, Tian, Kevin wrote:

>         Does the assumption still hold true that some static irqaction
> may be
> freed by this way? Or previous requirement already disappears today?
> Now all the virtual drivers finally fall down to request_irq which
> matches
> free_irq. Only instances to call setup_irq are native linux drivers,
> where
> free_irq is not required for those architecture specific static irq
> number.
>
>         Maybe this change can be removed now?
Yes, I think we can remove it. We used to use it for timer irqs, but no 
longer.
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel