RE: [Xen-devel] xm-test results

["Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> A sleep would be fine, but even better than that would be a loop that
> monitors
> /proc/cpuinfo, waiting for it to come down to 1 (with a timeout of
> course).
> That way, we are guaranteed to wait exactly long enough, and no
longer.

Ewan,

Your method looks better than a just a sleep. We will check in a patch
for this.

Aravindh

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel