Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] management tools portability

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 5 Jun 2006, at 16:00, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

> Since the patches touch a lot of code, it's easy for other checkins to
> cause conflicts and so it's difficult to maintain the patches out of
> tree.
Is this the last set of interface munging we need to do for ppc, or is 
there more in the pipeline? If these two patches are all that is now 
required, I'm inclined just to take them.
Apart from that, patch 3/3 changes lots of mfn fields to u64. Shouldn't 
they properly use your new xen_pfn_t type? There are a few other frame 
numbers dotted around the public headers that perhaps ought also to be 
converted?
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel