Re: [Xen-devel] evtchn_upcall_mask

[Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Hollis Blanchard (hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> So I'd like to abstract users of evtchn_upcall_mask in Xen (and Linux,
> mini-os, etc) into set/get accessors. On PPC and IA64, the accessors
> would deal directly with the register state, and the field itself
> wouldn't even exist.

Is local_irq_disable() not enough abstraction in Linux?  Oh, I see,
you mean for both sides of the fence.  From your description that makes
perfect sense to me.

thanks,
-chris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel