[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: clean up kclean and distclean for kernel
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 02:32:18PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 29 Jun 2006, at 10:18, Horms wrote: > > >The version of this patch that I sent earlier today was bogus as > >it was actually a duplicate of the 2nd patch I sent in this patch > >([PATCH 2/2] build: make linux download more flexible). > >This is what it should have looked like. > > > >The second patch itself should be fine as sent earlier today. > > These patches seem to churn the build system a bit but I'm not clear > how much they improve things. What do they improve? Anyone else > interested in seeing them committed? I feel that what they improve is farily clearly listed in the inline comments. I'm happy to trim them down if some bits are unwanted. But I do believe they significantly improve the semantics of both downloads and distclean. I have tested them quite extensively over serveral months now (though oviously not the minor updates I made yesterday relating to $LINUX_VER vs $LINUX_SRC, and I can confirm that at least in my environment they work well. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |