[Xen-devel] Re: [patch] domain builder rewrite, guest kexec

[Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>]

Horms wrote:
> 
> Wow, that looks pretty impressive indeed.
> 
> I wonder how much room there is for consolidating code in your domU
> kexec patch and the work that Magnus and I have done on dom0/hypervsisor
> kexec/kdump. 

I think there isn't much code which an be shared, if any.  kexec'ing a
domU and the physical machine are two very different problems.  When
merging both I think the easiest is to simply have two source files
(machine-kexec-xen[0U].c) and some small stub functions which all either
the dom0/hypervisor or domU kexec code.

cheers,

  Gerd

-- 
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/julika-dora.jpeg

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel