Just floating this for general comment -

For the bootloader work, we should consider Kboot:
http://kboot.sourceforge.net/

Kboot is designed to use a "conventional" bootloader to start a Linux kernel
kexec-ing the kernel the user actually wants to run.  The advantage of this
is that all the high level functionality of grub (interactive menus,
filesystem support, networking) are now provided by a full Linux environment
rather than a large special purpose codebase.

Some folks at IBM (Michael included) have been working on an update to this

The zSeries guys want this because their z/IPL bootloader doesn't have any
interactivity - rather like the domain builder.  They want to start a
default "kboot" kernel and have that display the user interface, offer
network boot options, etc, and then kexec to the "real" kernel.  Their
requirements are similar to ours, so kboot_sl is worth a look.

I think this is an approach we should look at.

It gets us:
* Guest kernel stored in its own filesystem
* Network boot
* Multiple filesystem support (in principle, anything that Linux supports)
* Exotic boot support (boot from http, ftp, ssh - good for developers)
* A common platform with other software

A port of Grub(2?) might also be nice to have, but I suspect that (given a
working kexec) kboot_sl will be easier to get working and will be more
flexible.

Cheers,
Mark

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 15:44, Ian Pratt wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Please find attached a proposal for the Xen development roadmap for the
> next 18 months or so.
>
> The roadmap gives a "state of the nation" summary and provides
> suggestions as to priorities going forward. I've tried to be inclusive
> and collect together many of the various features that folks have asked
> for, along with some implementation ideas to guide developers. The
> document ends with a table that has a suggested timeline for landing
> some of the more critical features. [NB: The doc was written over the
> period of a couple of months, so a few of the work items mentioned are
> already now complete and checked-in.]
>
> Lets discuss the proposal on xen-devel and at the xen mini summit, then
> get it tabulated onto the wiki as a live document.
>
> Best,
> Ian
>
> [latex text version follows, PDF attached]
>
> \author{Ian Pratt, July 2006}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> \maketitle
>
>
> Since around October 2005 the main focus of the Xen project has really
> been around stability: getting the 3.0.0 release out, and then ongoing
> hardening in preparation for FC5 and SLES10. We're now in the
> fortunate position of having really very few outstanding bugs, and now
> have excellent automated test infrastructure to help us maintain this
> level of quality.
>
> It's now time to turn thoughts to further development and work out
> where we want to take the project toward the next major release, Xen
> 3.1 (or 4.0, whatever we end up calling it). This document lists what
> I believe are the priorities over the coming months, and hence what
> the core Xen team will be investing effort in.
>
> \section{Releases}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> Rather than the big bang' 12 month development cycle used in Xen 1.0,
> 2.0 and 3.0, we want to make the development toward the next major
> release far more incremental. We aim to continue the current practise
> of going through a stabilization phase and having point releases every
> 10-12 weeks. Just as with Linux, the point release will be maintained
> with bug fixes until the next point release.
>
> One side effect of this approach is that at the time of a release not
> all features that are new in the code base may necessarily be stable
> in time for the release. We won't hold the release, but will simply
> disable such features or document the issues. The aim is obviously to
> avoid regressions in functionality that worked in earlier releases.
>
> \section{Performance, Scalability}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> During the Xen 3 development cycle the vast majority of effort went in
> to correctness rather than performance and scalability. It's pretty
> clear from looking at historic benchmark data that some performance
> bugs have crept in along the way: there really is no good reason why
> xen3 should perform worse than xen2 on any benchmark, but measurements
> indicate there are currently regressions on some benchmarks.  Clearly,
> investigation is called for. I expect there to be quite a bit of low
> hanging fruit, in particular it is likely that various of the Linux
> kernel version upgrades have broken certain assumptions causing us to
> exercise slow paths' rather than the fast path we expect it to be
> using. These need to be tracked down and fixed.
>
> We're actually quite well-armed with performance monitoring tools these
> days, so hopefully this shouldn't be too difficult: xen-oprofile is a
> sample-based profile system useful for looking at system-wide CPU
> consumption. The xen software performance counters are useful for
> tracking event occurrences in Xen (and hence spotting anomalously high
> counts of supposedly rare events), and can also be used to collect
> various histograms of scheduler and memory management data. There is
> also xentrace which can be enabled to collect timestamped trace
> records into a buffer to enable detailed event time-lines to be
> collected.
>
> We expect the vast majority of Xen deployments to be on two socket
> server boxes, with some four socket, and we expect dual core to be
> commonplace. Hence, we believe that the sweet spot to optimize xen for
> is 1-8 CPU systems. 32 way and larger systems are currently supported
> and getting good performance on them is certainly desirable in the
> mid-term. However, we must endeavour to ensure that such optimizations
> do not harm smaller system performance. If necessary, compile time
> target selection could be used, but I hope this won't be required. One
> of the key features which will help both small and large system
> performance is support for NUMA-aware memory allocation.  This is
> useful even on two socket AMD boxes.  I expect to see the core Xen
> mechanisms in the tree in short order, but implementing page migration
> (particularly the policy for doing so) will be a longer term goal.
> NUMA topology-aware CPU scheduling will also need to be developed, and
> is discussed in a later section.
>
> \section{Guest API stability}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> The Xen 3 Guest API is intended to be a stable interface that will be
> maintained in a backward compatible fashion. Old 3.0 guests should run
> on a new hypervisor. The converse of running new guests on an old
> hypervisor has not been a commitment, but we should obviously plan to
> transition toward this. This becomes more important as soon as a given
> version of Xen starts gaining wide use in an Enterprise Linux distro
> (e.g. SLES10).
>
> The xen guest API includes all the virtual IO interfaces
> (e.g. netfront, blkfront etc). We expect there to be some evolution
> in these protocols, but nothing that can't be supported in a
> compatible fashion: xenbus provides the necessary mechanisms for
> enabling feature selection, or even selection of alternate front or
> backend drivers.
>
> So far, there has been no commitment to maintain a stable interface
> between privileged domains (dom0) and xen, or between xend and
> dom0. We currently expect xen, the dom0 kernel, and the xend tool
> stack to be a matched set''. These interfaces will continue to evolve
> for at least the next six months, so no stability is guaranteed,
> though interface breakage will be avoided where possible as it's
> clearly inconvenient for developers. Interface version numbers should be
> updated when this happens to avoid subtle incompatibilities.
>
> The continued evolution of the privileged domain interfaces is being
> driven by a number of factors: changes such as the new pci device
> pass-through code, support for IOMMUs, integration of ia64 and ppc,
> more fine-grained security capability delegation. It should be a long
> term goal to stabilize this interface, but for the moment 2.6 Linux is
> in the favoured position of being the in-tree privileged domain OS,
> with NetBSD and Solaris playing catchup.
>
> One of the key APIs we expect to evolve and then stabilize quickly in
> the next 2-3 months is the xen control API, encompassing all the
> various XML parameters that configure and control guest domains. The
> roadmap for the xen control stack is set out later in this document.
>
> \section{OS Support}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> The following OS kernels have been ported to the Xen3 32b guest ABI:
> Linux 2.6.16, 2.6.9-34.EL, 2.4.21-40.EL, 2.6.5-7.252, NetBSD3,
> FreeBSD7.0 and OpenSolaris10. Work is planned to update the Plan9 port
> to xen 3, and the API stability will hopefully encourage other OSes to
> be ported too, such as OpenBSD. The only x86\_64 OS port is currently
> 2.6.16, but other ports are underway.
>
> Since the 3.0.0 release there have been various backward compatible
> enhancements to the Xen guest API, such as the feature flags' and
> transfer page'. These mechanisms are intended to make backward
> compatibility easier to maintain in future, and will be used to enable
> features such as supporting 32b guests on a 64b hypervisor, running
> xen kernels on bare metal, and running xen kernels as HVM (fully
> virtualized) guests.  We would urge maintainers of kernel ports to
> adopt the new feature flags and transfer page ASAP if they haven't
>
>
> \section{Getting xen support in kernel.org Linux}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> The work to get xen support into upstream kernel.org Linux is a
> crucial work item for the xen community. Although it costs
> considerable man effort right now, it should reduce the maintenance
> burden in the long run as hypervisor support will be a more visible
> consideration for Linux developers, and hopefully treated as a first
> class citizen.
>
> The full xen support for Linux patch maintained in the main xen
> repository is really quite large. As well as supporting Linux as an
> optimized SMP guest, it has all the functionality necessary to run
> Linux as a domain 0 with access to physical hardware, support for IO
> virtualization backends, support for the control tools etc.
>
> It is clear that getting such a large patch into kernel.org in one go
> is infeasible, so a more incremental approach has been adopted. Our
> initial aim is to submit patches that enable Linux to run as a simple
> Xen guest, without various of the more invasive paravirtualization
> optimizations that provide rather better virtual memory and SMP
> performance. A patchset has been prepared by Christian Limpach,
> Chris Wright and Jeremy Fitzhardinge, and is being iterated on LKML.
>
> The path into kernel.org has been muddied by the discussion around
> VMware's VMI proposal. VMI proposes an abstraction layer for the
> hypervisor to guest API used for CPU and memory management
> virtualization, and doesn't attempt to address the virtual IO,
> hardware access, and control tool APIs that the Xen patches
> address. VMI is also currently only addressing 32b x86 (Xen is
> currently x86\_64 and ia64 too).
>
> Comparing VMI with a subset of the xen patch, there's actually quite a
> lot in common. The bulk of both patches refactor i386 code to provide
> hooks, and it is hoped that these common changes can be upstreamed
> quickly, reducing the size of the external patch that must be
> maintained. Rusty Russell is taking the lead on this. At some point
> there will be a discussion about what the correct hypervisor API
> abstraction is, and hence the extent to which paravirtualization can
> be exploited to improve performance. The Xen team will be arguing
> vigorously that a rich interface that is part of the kernel source
> (and hence GPL) is more easily maintainable, and enables deeper'
> paravirtualization, and hence more opportunities for performance
> enhancements.
>
> It is conceivable that what ends up being merged into kernel.org may
> require some changes to the xen 3 guest ABI. We would certainly hope
> that these could be made backwards compatible with existing xen guest
> OSes, but we may have no choice other than to rev to a Xen 4 ABI. This
> would be a great shame as ABI stability is a key hypervisor
> requirement, but this would at least be a one off change.
>
> \section{Control tool stack}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> Following on from the discussions at the last Xen summit, a number of
> significant changes are planned for the xen control tool stack over
> the next few months. In the mid-term, the DMTF CIM model for VM
> life-cycle management from the virtualization and partitioning working
> group is likely to emerge as the standard for configuring and managing
> VMs. Many of the folks in the Xen community are already working in the
> DMTF in support of the CIM model, as well as Microsoft in their
> Carmine tools. The joint IBM/Novell/XenSource project to create CIM
> providers for Xen is of great strategic importance. However,
> management via CIM is quite heavyweight and intricate for some
> scenarios, so also having a simpler management API makes
> sense. Indeed, having such an API will be useful for building the CIM
> providers themselves.
>
> {\em XML config file and conversion tools.} The first stage of
> xend development will be to switch to using XML for all configuration
> data. We are in the process of drafting a specification for an XML
> data-model for storing all VM configuration data, and will be
> circulating this on xen-devel/xen-cim shortly. This scheme is
> inspired by' the CIM data model, but the hierarchy is somewhat
> flattened and simplified to reflect xen's requirements and provide an
> easy to navigate model.  The intention is that XML config files
> conforming to this schema would replace the current python and SXP
> xend config files. Since this is a user-visible change, creation of
> migration tools will be required. Config files would no longer live
> under /etc, but would be loaded into xend when a VM is created, and
> then stored as plain XML files under /var.
>
> {\em xend VM life cycle management and storage extensions.} Another
> addition will be implementation of some simple VM life-cycle
> management inside xend. The current tools already have a very limited
> form of this implemented by the xendomains script which will preserve
> VMs across host reboots using save/restore. Adding VM life-cycle
> management to xend means that we will store state for VMs even if they
> are not currently running. This will enable us to make operations like
> VM save/restore less dangerous from a user point of view by tracking
> the resources (in particular, disk images) they have reserved even
> when they are suspended. Further, support for simple storage
> management will be added to xend, enabling call-outs to create new
> disk images, create CoW snapshots etc. These will be implemented in
> scripts that provide the functionality for different storage backends
> e.g. LVM, file based, qcow, etc.
>
> In previous and current Xen releases the protocol between xm' and
> xend' has not been documented and has undergone rapid
> change. Although the internal xmlib API has generally remained
> relatively stable this has not been a popular interface for developers
> building on top of Xen -- most have resorted to using expect' scripts
> to drive the xm command line.
>
> {\em XML-RPC xen control API plus C/C++/perl/python bindings.} It's
> now important that we define a suitable message protocol and
> associated API, rapidly switch xend and xm over to using it, and then
> provide client bindings for common languages
> e.g. C++/perl/python. Libvirt will hopefully help fulfil this
> role. Draft specifications for the message protocol are being prepared
> and will be circulated shortly. The scheme is xml-rpc based, using an
> SSL secured https transport to enable secure remote management, or
> unix domain sockets for lightweight local management.
>
> The protocol will support a notion of logging in as a given user,
> using PAM to authenticate on the server. Since some of the RPC
> commands may be long running (e.g. a VM relocation), the protocol
> supports
> the notion of tasks running asynchronously in the background. The
> client can poll for their completion or list outstanding tasks.
>
> In addition to securing the control protocol, we also need to secure
> the networking connections used for VM relocation. The intention is to
> split the VM relocation operation into two, issuing a relocate\_receive
> that generates a token that then must be presented when initiating a
> relocate\_send. Since these network connections are performance
> critical, it is important we retain the option to have just
> authentication without mandating encryption.
>
> A further area where work is clearly required is developing a decent
> web GUI for Xen. There have been a number of previous attempts at this
> by various folk, but none have really gained traction. We would
> envisage that the GUI would be implemented using presentation layer
> code that would communicate with xend via the control protocol and
> one of the existing web UI's and trying to get it in-tree will help
> focus efforts.
>
>
> \section{Virtual Hard Disk Images}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> Xen 3.0 supports a wide range of storage options for guest virtual
> disks, including physical partitions (LUNs), LVM volumes, and loop'
> files. Use of loop files has proved popular as they support sparse
> allocation, and are very easy from a management/backup point of view
> (e.g. you can just copy the files around). However, the loop driver
> has some serious deficiencies, in particular it buffers writes very
> aggressively, which can affect guest filesystem correctness in the
> event of a host crash, and can even cause out-of-memory kernel crashes
> in domain0 under heavy write load. Further, using sparse files
> requires care to ensure the sparseness is preserved when copying, and
> there is no header in which metadata relating back to the VM can be
> stored.
>
> Given the popularity of the file-backed model, providing a robust and
> high performance solution that supports it is highly
> desirable. Rather than using raw image files, it makes sense to move
> independent of the underlying filesystem, and copy-on-write
> support. We have spent time evaluating a number of existing formats:
> VMware VMDK, Microsoft VHD, and QEMU QCOW. VMDK is a hodgepodge union
> of several different formats used by VMware, and doesn't have much to
> recommend it. Further, the licencing terms aren't entirely clear about
> its GPL compatibility. Microsoft's VHD format is pretty nice, but
> explicitly doesn't allow open source implementations. QEMU QCOW looks
> to be the best of the bunch: It's been part of the QEMU stable for
> options like compression and AES encryption as well as sparse
> allocation and copy-on-write.
>
> The world doesn't need another virtual hard disk format, so with
> Fabrice Bellard's blessing (QEMU author) we're strongly advocating
> that the Xen project adopt it. The licence on the current QCOW
> implementation is BSD, which makes implementation with Xen and even 3rd
> party closed-source tools easy (e.g. Virtual-to-Physical transfer
> utilities).
>
> Given the various problems with the loop' driver, this doesn't seem a
> good starting point for implementing qcow support. The easiest
> approach seems to be to build on the blktap' approach that is already
> in the tree and provides a way of implementing virtual block devices
> in user space. Work is well under way to implement a ublkback' driver
> that supports all of the various qemu file format plugins. A special
> high-performance qcow plugin is also under development, that supports
> better metadata caching, asynchronous IO, and allows request
> reordering with appropriate safety barriers to enforce correctness. It
> remains both forward and backward compatible with existing qcow disk
> images, but makes adjustments to qemu's default allocation policy when
> creating new disks such as to optimize performance.
>
>
>
> \section{Resource Control}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> One of the big deficiencies with Xen 3.0.2 is the static assignment of
> VCPUs to single physical CPUs. Although domain creation attempts to do
> some crude load-balancing placement on physical CPUs the assignment
> is not updated, which can lead to gross imbalance between CPUs if
> e.g. all even numbered VMs were to exit. Currently manual intervention
> with xm vcpu-pin' is required to rebalance things.
>
> A new CPU scheduler has recently been completed which should solve these
> issues. It supports automatic migration of VCPUs between their
> allowable CPU set, and actively balances VCPUs across CPUs
> in an attempt to maximise throughput.
>
> The scheduler supports a notion of weighted fair share', enabling the
> relative weights of guests to be set e.g. this guest should be able to
> get twice as much CPU as this guest (assuming they are both CPU bound
> and runnable). Further percentage CPU ceilings may be set to constrain
> the
> consumption of a guest, e.g. limiting it to 10\% of a CPU even if the
> CPU is otherwise idle. [This non-work conserving option is useful in
> hosting environments where it is sometimes desirable to stop customers
> having the opportunity to get used to more resource than they're
> paying for.]
>
> For multi VCPU guests the scheduler tries to ensure that each
> (runnable) VCPU accrues CPU time in roughly equal fashion. This avoids
> bad interactions with the guest OSes internal scheduler. Currently, no
> attempt is made to gang schedule VCPUs belonging to the same
> guest. For most workloads this seems to work OK. In future we may have
> to investigate schemes that switch to gang scheduling under certain
> circumstances, or otherwise use bad pre-emption avoidance (e.g. don't
> pre-empt while kernel locks held) or bad pre-emption mitigation
> strategies (e.g. directed yield). It may be possible to dynamically
> spot groups of VCPUs that are actively communicating and gang schedule
> them. We will need to extend the scheduler to better understand CPU
> topology and make informed scheduling decisions in the presence of
> hyperthreading or NUMA architectures (in the short term, we can use
> CPU affinity settings to assist this). Due to potential information
> leakage through cache timing attacks between domains sharing the same
> belonging to the same core are gang scheduled for the same domain (of
> shared with a trusted IO domain).
>
>
> One other scheduling feature that has been discussed is instrumenting
> domain 0 to enable the work that it performs on behalf of other guests
> to be accounted to those guests. The simplest way to do this is just
> to do some simple counting of grant transfer and grant map events for
> each domain, and then bill the CPU time consumed by domain 0 in
> proportion (with an adjustment factor to account for the CPU
> differences between disk and network IO). Although simple, this scheme
> would probably yield most of the benefit, and avoid CPU-bound domains
> being penalized in the presence of bulk IO.
>
>
> Support for network QoS is in pretty good shape: The netback driver
> can implement token bucket rate limiting (x KB every y
> microseconds)'') on any virtual interface to enforce simple max rate
> control. More complex queueing and scheduling strategies can be
> implemented simply by invoking Linux's existing iptables and
> traffic\_control facilities.
>
> Some control over disk IO bandwidth is now possible using Linux's
> inbuilt CFQ IO scheduler. Using ionice' it is possible to set the
> relative priorities for disk accesses. More experimentation is
> required to determine whether this will prove to be a sufficient means
> of control, or whether some further controls (e.g. implemented in
> blkback) will be necessary to provide xen admins with the features the
> require. Disk scheduling is a well-known thorny research problem, and
> best driven by user requirements.
>
>
>
> \section{HVM (fully virtualized) Guests}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> As CPUs with Intel VT and AMD-V support come to market in volume,
> HVM'' guest support is now a critically important core feature of Xen.
> The current support we have today is OK'', but we know we can do a lot
> better, and really make the new hardware fly. This involves
> substantial surgery to a number of key subsystems, but we seem to be
> making good progress.
>
>
> One of the most important and complex subsystems in Xen is the shadow
> pagetable code. For paravirtualized guests, this is typically only
> used when guests are undergoing live relocation, but for HVM guests it
> is turned on the whole time and is critical to performance. The code
> has to support a number of different modes of operation, and deal with
> the differences between guest and host page table levels -- the code
> supports 2-on-2/3/4, 3-on-3/4, and 4-on-4.
>
> The current shadow pagetable implementation is large and very complex,
> partly as a result of having been hacked on by a lot of different
> people each addressing their own requirements. The algorithm itself
> isn't too bad, but we've now accumulated a lot of profile data from
> different OSes to enable us to do a better job this time round. We
> have designed a new algorithm and have embarked on a complete rewrite
> of the code, which will take some time complete. Because of the shadow
> pagetable code's importance, testing it is a major task as the test
> matrix of different OS versions and configurations is vast. We will
> need to run the two code bases in parallel for some period of time,
> either in different trees, or possibly in a single tree with a boot
> option. We have a list of optimizations and heuristics we intend to
> add to the new implementation once the core is stable.  In the
> meantime, there are various folks continuing to fix and optimize the
> code currently in the xen tree, which further helps inform the new
> design.
>
> \subsection{QEMU}
>
> QEMU has proved to be very helpful for providing Xen HVM guests with
> emulated IO devices. However, Xen's current qemu-dm'' code has
> diverged quite heavily from mainline qemu, which means that we can't
> as easily capitalise on enhancements made to mainline qemu, and also
> makes it harder for us to contribute enhancements back to
> Fabrice. Fixing this is a priority. We are developing a
> re-implementation of qemu-dm that is maintained as a patch queue
> against an unmodified snapshot of mainline qemu, and hope to have this
> ready for testing soon. Like the shadow pagetable code, this is going
> to require extensive testing even prior to inclusion in -unstable.
>
> Catching up with the latest version of qemu has a number of nice side
> effects. It gets us Anthony Liguori's improved VNC server code for the
> framebuffer, removing our dependency on the rather obtuse libvncserver
> library. Further, it gets us support for emulated USB devices, most
> interesting of which is a USB mouse. The USB mouse protocol supports a
> mode of operation whereby it provides absolute x,y co-ordinates
> rather relative motion events (which the OS usually turns into
> absolute co-ordinates using some unknown black box' algorithm that
> has mouse speed and acceleration parameters). Being able to inject
> absolute co-ordinates means that it is easy to arrange for our the
> HVM guest cursor to perfectly track the local cursor in the VNC
> viewer, regardless of the user's mouse settings.
>
> Although not immediately on the horizon, there are plans to give qemu
> a slightly extended role in Xen. The V2E' research work in Cambridge
> has shown that it is possible to move the execution state of a guest
> from a Xen virtual machine into qemu and back out again. In the
> context of the research work the aim was to enable high-performance
> taint tracking to be implemented, where the guest ran at full speed as
> a xen guest until it accessed a tainted value at which point execution
> was moved on to the qemu emulator which was able to monitor execution
> closely. At some point later execution would be moved back to Xen.  As
> pointed out by Leendert, a similar approach can be used for
> transitioning into IO emulation, cleaning up the current interface and
> possibly providing performance optimizations when many IO operations
> are performed in close proximity. This technique also solves a thorny
> issue with Intel VT systems, which unlike AMD-V do not provide h/w
> assistance for virtualizing the legacy x86 real mode'. Today, we have
> the vmxassist' code containing a crude emulator to try and handle
> this case, but the code fails in the presence of certain complex 16b
> applications, such as MSDOS or the SuSE graphical boot loader. Having
> the ability to throw execution onto QEMU which has a complete real
> mode emulation would solve this problem.
>
> \subsection{Paravirtualization Enhancements}
>
> Although we can run completely unmodified guest OSes in HVM mode,
> there are significant performance advantages that can be achieved by
> selectively adding paravirtualization extensions to guests. The nice
> unmodified, then incrementally enhance the OS to exploit Xen's
> paravirtualization hypercall API to improve performance, for example,
> adding paravirtualized IO drivers, then paravirtualized virtual memory
> and CPU operations etc.
>
> The Xen API's hypercall transfer page assists in allowing the precise
> method used to make the hypercall to be abstracted from the guest
> (e.g. INT82 in the full-paravirtualized case, VMCALL on VT, VMMCALL on
> AMD-V). However, the exact method for installing the page (e.g. by
> writing MSRs) and passing in-memory arguments to hypercalls has yet to
> be finalized, though there are prototype patches in existence. Making a
> decision on which approach to checkin is a priority.
>
> Typically, the paravirtualizing extension that has most impact is
> switching from using IO emulation to using PV drivers. This can be
> done by taking the core of the existing netfront/blkfront/xenbus
> drivers and providing appropriate wrappers to enable them to be built
> against a native (non Xen) Linux tree, and thus loaded as modules into
> the native kernel running as a HVM guest. PV drivers can similarly be
> prepared for other OSes.
>
> \subsection{Save/Restore/Relocation}
>
> One of the key features missing in Xen's current support for HVM
> guests is save/restore. Several subsystems need to be updated to add
> this support. We need to exploit qemu's ability to pickle' the IO
> state of a guest and be able to pass it down a file descriptor. We
> need to add code to Xen to enable the state of all of the
> high-performance emulated devices such as the PIC, APIC, IOAPIC etc,
> to be read out via a the get\_domaininfo dom0 op. We then need a simple
> update to the xc\_save code to work with auto-translate shadow mode
> guests. The restore operation requires very similar changes, enabling
> device state to be unpickled' in both Xen and qemu.  Having got
> save/restore working, live relocation should actually be relatively
> straight forward, just enabling log-dirty' mode for auto-translate
> mode guests.
>
> \subsection{SMP Guests}
>
> The current HVM code only stably supports uniprocessor guests, though
> work is underway to robustify SMP guest support. Xen already contains
> APIC and IOAPIC emulation modules, but this code along with the
> existing shadow pagetable code lacks synchronization in certain
> places. The new shadow mode code should go a long way to solving
> this. Work is also ongoing to add ACPI BIOS support, hence allowing
> the emulated platform to look like a modern PC. The first aim for
> supporting SMP guests is correctness, and once we have that focus on
> performance and scalability. Getting fair performance for two and four
> way guests should be achievable for many workloads, but this is an
> area where paravirtualization really helps. Eventually, it would be
> good to support CPU hotplug emulation in Xen.
>
> \subsection{Mid-term goals}
>
> Looking toward the mid-term, there are a number of projects around HVM
> guests that would be good to see implemented.
>
> One of the key desires is to move the qemu device emulation out of
> domain 0, and run it in a stub domain' associated with its HVM
> guest. A stub domain' is the effectively the execution context
> associated with a domain that a paravirtualized guest would normally
> use, but is currently unused for HVM guests. Belonging to the same
> domain, any CPU time spent executing in the stub domain is naturally
> accounted to the guest. Like normal paravirtualized guests, stub
> domains are strongly isolated from other domains. However, given the
> close relationship with the HVM guest, executing transitions between
> the two occur faster than transitions to a secondary domain. Further,
> belonging to the same domain means that the stub domain can easily map
> memory belonging to the HVM guest. These properties mean that stub
> domains are an ideal place to run qemu, providing improved performance,
> accurate resource accounting, and surer isolation.
>
> As a user space application, Qemu can't run in the stub domain
> directly, but requires an operating system kernel. The neatest way of
> doing this would be to link qemu against minios', which is
> effectively a library operating system for just this purpose. Since
> minios makes use of a broad range of libc calls, it is likely that
> minios will take some time to reach the required level of support. In
> the meantime, we can just use a xen linux kernel, with a minimal
> config to keep the size down. Since protection between user space and
> the kernel is irrelevant in the context of running qemu as the sole
> application, we could optimize performance by running user-space at
> the same privilege level as the kernel, effectively turning system
> calls into plain jmp instructions into the kernel followed by a ret to
> return.
>
> An interesting thing becomes possible once we have qemu running in
> stub domains and interfacing with the HVM guest via the V2E' approach
> described previously: it becomes quite easy to enable unmodified
> guests to be run on CPUs that don't support VT or AMD-V. Gust
> execution in user space would proceed in the normal xen fashion, but
> any transition into the kernel would result in the guest being
> transferred on to qemu for emulation, which would then transition back
> to native execution when the guest exited the kernel. Having the
> emulation running in a stub domain is clearly important to allow the
> resource spend in emulation to be correctly accounted. Performance
> would clearly not be as good with VT/AMD-V approach, but this does
> provide a good way for folks with older hardware to experience
> unmodified guests on Xen.
>
> >From our point of view, QEMU's biggest failing is that the devices it
>
> emulates are quite old, and lack some facilities that could
> potentially lead to better performance. It would be nice to have an
> emulation of a SCSI HBA, as most OSes typically treat these
> differently from an IDE device and make more use of the ability to
> have multiple outstanding requests, which is essential for good IO
> performance in a virtualized environment. BOCHS has a simple SCSI HBA
> emulation, and it may be possible to use this as a starting point.
>
> Emulating a different network device would also offer benefits. A
> network device that supported checksum offload, jumbo frames, or TSO
> (Transmit Segmentation Offload) could all offer CPU savings in the
> guests. Since IO performance is typically dominated by the number of
> vmexit' operations required, care is required when selecting which
> hardware device to emulate to ensure that the corresponding driver
> will generate a minimal number of exits. Older hardware is sometimes
> better in this respect, since the driver writer knew certain io port
> and mmio operations were likely expensive, and thus went out of their
> way to avoided doing them. Since such io port and mmio operations
> typically generate vmexits in the Xen case, minimizing them is helpful
> for performance.
>
>
> \section{Paravirtualized Guests}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> As stated earlier PV guest support in Xen looks in good shape from a
> stability point of view, but we do need to pay some close attention to
> benchmarking and tuning, particularly for large SMP guests. There is
> undoubtedly plenty of low hanging fruit that can be addressed to
> improve Xen performance -- it just hasn't been a priority given the
> state of the competition.
>
> One area that could certainly do with some attention is the 64b Linux
> guest ports. The code could do with a full code review, specifically
> to remove some of the unnecessary divergence from the i386 xen code,
> and to remove some of the modifications relative to native that are
> now unnecessary. There are a number of opportunities for investigating
> optimizations too. The current code was written assuming that the TLB
> flush filter'' found on AMD Opteron processors would become
> the feature from future chips.  There are a number of places where TLB
> flushes occur in the current code where it was expected that the flush
> filter would actually annul them. Given that we can no longer rely on
> this, some modifications to the virtual memory virtualization
> implementation is called for to reduce the number of TLB flushes. One
> particular idea that has been mooted is using the global bit in PTEs
> to preserve both Xen and User mappings across system calls. This needs
> to be implemented and benchmarked. Hopefully Intel/AMD will extend the
> x86 architecture with an address-space tagged TLB implementation at
> some point, providing a clean solution.
>
> One area that hasn't received much attention recently is the live
> relocation'' feature since the 32b PAE and 64b hypervisor variants were
> introduced. Although the current code seems to work, it's never been
> productized' on these hypervisor variants, so shouldn't be relied
> upon. The new shadow pagetable code being developed primarily for
> improved HVM guest support should also help address this concern,
> greatly simplifying the current code.
>
> We also need to do some work on the xc\_restore function itself,
> modifying it to support lazy allocation of memory to avoid the current
> issue whereby when relocating a guest you (temporarily) need to
> allocate enough memory for the maximum memory size of the guest even
> if its current size is much smaller due to memory ballooning.  Further,
> we could probably improve guest down-time by a few 10's of
> milliseconds if we did some streamlining of the various hotplug
> scripts and python code that do re-plumbing of network and block
> devices after a live relocation.
>
>
> \subsection{PV Block IO}
>
> The current block device protocols and implementations are in pretty
> good shape. The work to add a secondary backend implementation called
> backtap' to support high-performance file-based qcow implementation
> has previously been discussed. This blkfront implementation uses the
> same guest IO API, and can be used interchangeably with the current
> blkback and blktap backends.
>
> One area that does need some discussion is whether the protocol should
> be extended to support in-band metadata operations, for example,
> enabling the front end to issue something akin to ioctl on the
> backend. Such requests could probably be implemented fairly straight
> forwardly, as a special variant of a write operation that also returns
> data in-place.  We would need to have well defined meanings and
> enumeration of these ioctl-like operations since there may be entirely
> different operating system kernels at either end of the block protocol
> device channel. However, for occasional' ioctl operations it might be
> best just to use the xenbus control channel between front and
> backend. This can also be used for passing messages the other way. In
> particular, we should use this protocol to handle removable media
> change events better than we currently do. This mechanism could also
> be used to provide notification of virtual disk size changes, enabling
> an on-line resize tool to be invoked to provide seamless growing of
> virtual disks.
>
> One extension that has been requested by at least one proprietary
> filesystem vendor is the ability to return metadata with both read and
> write responses (rather than just noting completion).  This meta data
> is interpreted by the file system and used to optimize certain
> journaling operations. These extensions are currently considered
> rather specialized an probably mandate a separate blk protocol.
>
> Another idea that has been mooted is supporting a scsi-level device
> channel protocol, and hence scsifront/back drivers. This would be
> useful for controlling more exotic' devices that need a richer set of
> operations than just read/write/barrier, e.g. a tape drive. It does
> introduce a whole load of fairly pointless scsi command creation and
> parsing at either end for the normal read/write case, which may end up
> resulting in measurable overhead. Experimentation is required.
>
>
> \subsection{PV Network IO}
>
> One key area that needs some performance tuning is the paravirtualized
> network device driver.  The current drivers use a page-granularity
> protection mechanism to provide good containment and thus minimal
> trust between the frontend and backend drivers, but this does exercise
> the page protection mechanisms pretty hard.
>
> There are a number of fairly obvious extensions to the network device
> channel protocol that should yield useful performance improvements.
> Some of these could be implemented in a backward compatible fashion by
> using spare fields in the current protocol, but at some point we're
> likely to want to define the net device channel v2 protocol. This is
> not really a big deal as the xenbus control plane is there to ensure
> that we get the right drivers bound at each end of a device
> channel.
>
> One cleanup that is required is to modify the way that the checksum
> offload protocol is implemented, allowing the offset of the checksum
> in the packet to be specified. This should clean up some of the
> current fragility we have in domain 0 when checksum offload is enabled
> and certain less common protocols are used.
>
> Another useful improvement to the current code would be to add
> a flag to the data area of skb's that have been the subject
> of decrypt-in-place operations (e.g. for IPSEC VPN's), and only
> selectively scrub the flagged pages when adding buffers to the free
> queue.
>
> The current driver uses page flipping as the only mechanism for
> transferring data over the device channel. The device channel
> mechanism is actually quite flexible, and with a simple bit of
> refactoring, it should be possible to give the hypervisor the option
> of either copying the packet or flipping the page, making the decision
> based on the operation size. The copy operation may become
> particularly attractive if high-performance multi-threaded copy
> engines start becoming integrated in to northbridges, as has been
> speculated in some quarters.
>
> Another possibility worth investigating is the use of a semi-static
> shared memory buffer between the front and backend i.e. the grant
> table mappings are set up in advance for the buffer and
> left in place rather than being cycled. On the receive path, netback
> could directly copy packet payloads into the shared buffer from the
> hardware receive buffer, and then netfront could directly copy
> out of the shared buffer and into a local skb (2 copies, but no
> hypercalls).
>
> It would be nice to eliminate the copy in netfront, but this is quite
> hard as the skb could end up queued for an arbitrary amount of time in
> an application socket buffer, hence consuming resource in the shared
> buffer. We could grow the shared buffer if we run out of space, but
> there's no real bound to the size that would be needed and the number
> of in-flight buffers we'd have to track. Possibly some adaptive scheme
> that uses copying for buffers that are likely to be long lived or when
> we are low on shared buffer resource would be possible. However, the
> downside of this approach is that guests have to invest more trust in
> their backend domains as they retain writable mappings to the packets
> sitting in kernel buffers. A buggy or malicious backend could modify
> the contents of a packet buffer after the guest kernel had validated it,
> and could very likely cause it to crash.
>
> There are also performance enhancements to be achieved through
> supporting some of the higher-level features provided by modern server
> adaptors. Jumbo frame support would clearly be useful, both in domain
> 0 and from guest VMs, but many Ethernet installations still use a 1500
> byte MTU, so couldn't benefit. TCP Segmentation Offload (TSO) for the
> transmit path would be useful, whereby the frontend passes the backend
> a very large super packet' for it to segment and transmit (ideally,
> passing it to the NIC to do the segmentation if we can get the super
> packet through the bridge and routing code). Even if we end up having
> to do the segmentation in the backend we're still better off than we
> were passing multiple packets as we've reduced overhead and made it
> easier to batch work across the device channel.
>
> To support TSO, we need to extend the device channel descriptor format
> to flag packets that should be segmented. Since super packets are
> unlikely to be physically contiguous, we also need to be able to
> support data fragments in the descriptor format. This should be a
> relatively simple extension, adding chaining to netring descriptor
> entries.
>
> In future, we should consider how we might export byte stream (TCP)
> data between domains in a high performance fashion. This would be
> particularly useful between VMs running the same machine, or when TCP
> Offload Engines (TOE) in hardware NICs become commonplace. Similarly we
> should have an extended interface for exporting RDMA (Remote DMA)
> capabilities.
>
> Examining oprofile traces of Xen systems under heavy network load it
> looks like the network bridge code running in domain 0 takes a
> surprisingly large slice of the CPU. It's quite possible that we'd do
> better with some cut-down streamlined bridge code that just handles
> the common case that typical Xen installations use it under. At the
> very least, we need to do some investigation into why the current
> bridge code shows up in profile results as high up the ranking as it
> currently does.
>
> The current netfront/netback approach is geared toward having domain 0
> (or another domain) acting as the switch/router for packets between
> other domains. There are some circumstances where it may be more
> efficient to create virtual point-to-point' links between VMs,
> enabling them to communicate directly without going via a software
> switch/router. This would be akin to connecting two netfront devices
> together, allowing very high performance networking between two VMs on
> the same machine. This could be used in applications where there is
> effectively a processing pipeline of data being passed between
> VMs. Were one of the VMs in the pipeline to be migrated to a different
> machine, the netfront on each end of the point-to-point link could
> revert back to being connected to a netback driver, fulfilling the
> connection via the external network, albeit at lower bandwidth.
>
> While adding all these extensions to the protocol we should remember
> that these same paravirtualized drivers are used to provide
> paravirtualized IO within HVM guests, and ensure that they work in
> both scenarios.
>
>
> \subsection{Client Devices}
>
> Although most Xen deployments are currently targeted at server
> machines, improving support for desktop and laptop usage is clearly
> important, not least to encourage developers to run xen on their main
> machines. Having excellent support for client devices such as USB and
> the frame buffer is clearly required, along with good power management.
>
> Way back in the days of Xen 2 we had support for passing control of
> individual USB devices over to a guest VM. However, although
> apparently stable, the implementation wasn't ideal and was never
> updated to Linux 2.6. The best you can do today on Xen 3 is to assign
> a whole USB host controller to a guest using PCI pass-through, rather
> than individual hub ports as before.
>
> There have been patches floated for adding this support back to Xen 3,
> but there's never been quite the impetus to get consensus and get
> something checked in. The situation has recently become more
> complicated with the USB-over-IP code now appearing in Andrew
> Morton's Linux tree, perhaps suggesting that the design should be
> revisited.The TCP transport would be replaced with a reliable
> byte-stream device channel transport to avoid the need for network
> configuration. It would be good to return USB support to Xen 3 as soon
> as possible, as this will solve a number of requirements around audio
> virtualization, mouse, scanners etc.
>
> For PV guests, Xen currently only supports a virtual serial
> console. If a graphical console is required the guest needs to run its
> own networked frame buffer console, typically Xvnc. This is less than
> ideal as it requires networking to be working in the guest before the
> console can be used. Serial console serves perfectly well for boot,
> though some users get confused by the differences between a serial
> console and a typical Linux Virtual Terminal (VT).
>
> The best solution to this is to implement an in-kernel fbdev
> paravirtual frame buffer driver, which uses a shared memory device
> channel to make the frame buffer available to domain 0, where it can
> either be rendered locally, or converted to a network frame buffer
> protocol. This is precisely what happens with the console of HVM
> guests today, so will also help unify the look and feel' between PV
> and HVM guests. Having the PV framebuffer as a kernel fbdev means that
> it will be able to emulate a text mode and display messages from
> fairly early in the boot sequence, again making operation closer to
> native.
>
> In a basic implementation, the framebuffer control software in domain
> 0 would run periodically and either copy the shared memory region to the
> local display window, or generate the appropriate VNC updates. Scanning
> the whole frame buffer is obviously inefficient, particularly as there
> are frequently no updates, or the updates are quite localised (e.g. a
> flashing cursor). The current HVM frame buffer code implements a
> scheme whereby page-level write-protection of the framebuffer is used
> to trap updates, and hence provide a (very) rough indication of which
> areas of the frame buffer need scanning for updates. Since this code
> primarily uses VNC as a backend, the current framebuffer contents is
> compared against a snapshot to enable a more compact network encoding.
> The PV framebuffer should ideally share much of this code. Rather than
> using a page-fault based approach, if the guest maps the framebuffer
> once from a single set of pagetable pages, it may be possible to get
> better performance using dirty' bits on PTEs rather than taking write
> faults.
>
> Achieving decent 2D graphics performance really requires more help
> than can be achieved simply by monitoring page-level granularity
> updates. Ideally, the framebuffer backend code would be provided with
> accurate bounding box update rectangles, and explicit copy region'
> and fill region' commands (along with a separate hardware cursor
> rather than just rendering it into the framebuffer). In the HVM guest
> case, this could be achieved by emulating a graphics card which
> supported (and whose common OS drivers supported) copy and fill
> operations. In the PV guest case, the kernel fbdev interface is not
> rich enough to supply this data, so this implies that we will need to
> write an Xserver driver module that supplies this data to the backend
> via a side-band shared memory interface. Requiring modification of the
> Xserver to achieve decent graphics performance is unfortunate, but
> there is precedent -- this is the approach VMware have taken.
>
> Anthony Liguori and Markus Armbruster are working on a PV framebuffer
> patch that addresses many of these issues and we hope to commit it
> shortly.
>
> Achieving decent 3D graphics virtualization requires a substantially
> higher-level interface than that for 2D. With both the Xserver and
> Microsoft window systems moving in the direction of using 3D rendering
> even for desktop graphics, 3D graphics is becoming mainstream and not
> just the preserve of games and CAD/CAM. We will need to investigate
> drivers that encapsulate and transport OpenGL and/or Direct3D commands
> into backend domains where they can be rendered by the 3D graphics
> hardware. There are already a couple of projects that are
> investigating this is the context of OpenGL: Jacob Gorm Hansen's work
> presented at the last Xen summit, and a new project at CMU/Toronto
> based on Chromium.
>
> \subsection{Smart IO devices}
>
> There is no denying that IO virtualization in software incurs extra
> latency and CPU overhead relative to native. For applications that
> require the best possible performance, some help from the IO hardware
> is required. For over a decade their have been specialist smart'
> network interfaces available that have had the necessary hardware
> support to be accessed directly from user-level applications in a safe
> and protected fashion. Most of these interfaces have been targeted at
> the High Performance Computing market, designed for doing low-latency
> message passing, but some newer interfaces also support standard
> TCP/IP/Ethernet protocols. The requirements made of a network device
> to be able to provide safe direct access from guest virtual machines
> is very similar to those for providing direct access to user-level
> applications in a traditional non-virtualized environment. We
> anticipate many of these smart network interfaces becoming quite
> mainstream over the next couple of years as virtualization becomes
> ubiquitous. The same principles can also be applied to storage access,
> but in our experience the benefits are less pronounced.
>
> hardware on xen, and the code for this is available in the
> ext/xen-smartio.hg tree on xenbits. In future, we expect to see
> support added for the Level5 and NetXen (previously known as UNM)
> smart NICs which are more like traditional Ethernet interfaces.
>
> Typically, the main device driver is run in domain 0, which is
> responsible for allocating the NICs resources to other VMs and hence
> allowing them to map page-aligned control regions of the PCI device's
> address space into their own virtual address space. The main driver
> also controls what memory pages each of the virtual NICs is allowed to
> issue DMA operations to/from. Guest VMs use a small unprivileged
> driver to operate the virtual NIC's free/receive/transmit queues via
> their control area. The NIC typically also supports some QoS traffic
> shaping of outbound traffic from a virtual NIC, and may support more
> sophisticated receive demultiplex and inbound/outbound firewalling
> options beyond simple layer-2 demultiplexing. Having such features
> implemented in hardware is important as users typically don't want to
> give this up when switching from the current s/w solution.
>
> Before the code can be included in the main xen tree we need to have
> decided the interface through which these smart NICs interact with
> Xen's memory management to ensure that a guest requesting DMAs to a
> page is actually the owner of that page. Since most OSes tend to
> re-cycle network buffers it is usually the case that network packets
> are received into and sent from a relatively small and static pool of
> memory. This is quite a simple scenario that can be dealt with by
> pre-pinning the buffers with the NIC and with Xen. Storage poses more
> of a challenge as the pages used for DMA will be spread throughout the
> system, particularly for writes (though writes are less latency
> sensitive). Clearly, making decisions on this interface should be
> strongly influenced by the support planned for chipset IOMMUs.
>
> Another area where care needs to be taken is consideration of the
> interaction between VM relocation and smart NICs. In general, it is
> not safe to save/restore/relocate a VM that has direct access to
> hardware. Given that access to the interface is under the control of
> the domain 0 main driver, it is typically possible to arrange for this
> operation to be safe. However, relocating a VM to another physical
> machine would require that the destination machine had the same smart
> NIC hardware, which is inconvenient. We are considering the
> possibility of having a pluggable driver architecture that could enable
> the domain builder to slide in' a different low-level driver suitable
> for the new machine.
>
> \subsection{PV Filesystem-level Virtualization}
>
> Block-level IO virtualization provides an abstraction for accessing
> storage that users will be very familiar with. However, a
> filesystem-level abstraction offers a number of interesting
> possibilities too. This would work rather like a network file system
> such as NFS or OpenAFS, but without the need for networking as a
> shared memory device channel transport between fsfront/fsback would
> employed. Thus, xenfs'' would enable one domain to export a subtree of
> its file system to be imported and mounted by another virtual
> machine. A range of different semantics could be implemented,
> including a typical coherent shared file-space, or copy on write.
>
> The xenfs approach is quite interesting as it provides a very high
> performance mechanism for guests to share data in a coherent fashion
> via shared buffer cache mappings to the same file. A shared buffer
> cache could also avoid some IO, and yield memory savings. Implementing
> this for PV guests requires use of a new type of page fault,
> copy-to-write'' which is different from copy-on-write'' in that the
> all mappings to the immutable old page must be updated to the new
> copy. Fortunately, an implementation of CTW faults for Linux has already
> been developed by the embedded systems community, who need it when
> mapping pages stored in Flash memory.
>
> Mark Williamson is working on the XenFS implementation.
>
>
> \section{Core hypervisor}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> One of the key features we'd like to add to Xen soon is the ability to
> run a mix of 32b and 64b paravirtualized guests on a 64b hypervisor
> (just like you can with HVM guests already today).
>
> Because of the similarity in pagetable formats, it should be possible
> to run 32b PAE guests on a 64b hypervisor pretty straightforwardly and
> with good performance. We just need to provide a compat32' version of
> the hypercall table and export a 32b version of the m2p' table. Since
> the hypervisor can live outside the 32b address space of the guest we
> can exploit the code in the Linux port to allow a variable sized
> hypervisor hole to enable us set the hole size to zero, giving the
> guest the full address space.  Supporting non-PAE guests is also
> possible, but would require the use of shadow pagetables to convert
> between the guest and host pagetable formats. Given the resulting
> performance hit, it's probably best to just stick to PAE guest
> kernels.
>
> Work on adding NUMA support to Xen is important now that integrated
> memory controllers on CPUs are commonplace. The goals for this work
> have been discussed earlier in this document.
>
> Right now, Xen has no support for allowing guest kernels to exploit
> superpage mappings to access 2/4MB machine-contiguous memory
> regions -- we always factor such mappings into multiple potentially
> sparse 4KB mappings. This has the potential to impact TLB usage for
> some workloads [NB: it is worth noting that both shadow-mode and
> direct-mode pagetable implementations mean that it is typically
> necessary to protect kernel mappings on 4KB page granularity so it is
> typically not possible to allow kernel use of such mappings.]
>
> Xen's memory allocator is already capable of managing and allocating
> contiguous memory chunks. However, we would need to add some guest
> accounting to control the number of multi-page contiguous regions a
> guest is allowed to claim, otherwise we have the potential for one
> guest to hog all the contiguous chunks to the detriment of
> others. Such accounting is useful today even without superpage
> support as privileged guests can use machine-contiguous regions for IO
> purposes, and it would be good to bound the number of these.
>
> Adding superpage support for mappings of user-space memory for HVM
> guests is pretty straightforward, though it will always be necessary
> to be able to factor one of those mappings later if maintaining the
> invariants of the shadow pagetable algorithm requires it. Support for
> direct-mode paravirtualized guests should also be possible, though is
> made slightly more complicated by an annoying quirk of the x86
> pagetable format that means that linear mappings interact poorly with
> superpage entries as it is not possible to generate a trap if a super
> page PTE is accessed as though it is an L1 entry. Places in Xen where
> we access the guest pagetable via a linear mapping will need to be
> audited. On a 64b hypervisor there should be fewer of these as using
> the direct 1:1 mapping is typically preferable.
>
> Power management is also a concern for the mid-term. We can certainly
> put idle processes into a deeper sleep state than we currently
> do. Looking even further out, we could also even adapt the Xen
> scheduler to make CPU clock frequency scaling decisions, and
> distribute load across processors to minimize power requirements.
> Getting whole-system (as opposed to guest) suspend and hibernate
> support would be a useful feature for laptop users. This shouldn't
> actually be too hard, to the extent that Linux supports the function
> running native on a given system. We will need to add stubs in Xen to
> do the final stage power down and following resuscitation.
>
>
> IOMMUs look set to become common on future x86 server platforms, which
> offers a number of benefits for Xen.  IOMMUs are clearly useful to
> ensure protection when assigning an IO device to a VM: without one a
> malicious or buggy guest could destablize the system or read data
> belonging to other VMs by instructing the device to DMA to/from memory
> pages other than those it owns. As well as providing protection, most
> IOMMUs also provide translation of DMA addresses. This means that they
> can be used to enable HVM guests to be delegated direct access to a
> hardware device as well as PV guests. Note that save/resume/relocate
> operations are likely not possible on guests with direct hardware
> access, unless the hardware and driver has been designed for this
> purpose.
>
> Most IOMMUs typically don't support the fault-and-fixup style of
> operation that is common with CPU memory management: Any lookup
> failure is difficult to recover from, and likely involves resetting IO
> buses and devices, and likely results in lost IO operations. Xen must
> be able to recover from such situations.
>
> In the case of a HVM guest that is not actively co-operating with Xen,
> Xen has to maintain an IOMMU data structure containing the full set of
> guest physical pages the guest may wish to instruct the IO device to
> access. It must ensure that each of those pages is pinned and hence
> it's ownership (or mmu type) can't change. Before a page can be
> unpinned and released (for example, by the balloon driver), xen must
> remove it from the IOMMU pagetable structure, issue a flush or
> invalidate, and wait for confirmation the flush has completed. On a
> processor supporting nested pagetables, it may be possible to share
> the guest-physical to machine frame translation pagetable with the
> IOMMU.
>
> For PV guests (or HVM guests with PV extensions), the guest can be
> more actively involved with co-ordinating what pages are accessible
> via the IOMMU. The simplest mechanism for doing this would be to use
> the hooks provided by the kernel's DMA mapping/unmapping API and have
> these operations call down into Xen to update the IOMMU
> appropriately. On x86 this strategy is likely to be quite costly as
> there is little batching to amortize the hypercall to do the mapping,
> though unmapping can potentially be done lazily provided the pages
> remain pinned.
>
> Driver domains need to perform IO on behalf of other domains, and the
> grant table mechanism gives them the ability to create temporary
> mappings to read/write data. To be able to deliver data in a zero copy
> fashion, page grants need to be extended to the IOMMU. The grant table
> mechanism was designed with this in mind, so it's a relatively
> straightforward extension. When calling into xen to map a grant
> handle, a guest can specify whether the page should also be added to
> the IOMMU. The grant unmap operation can operate in a similar fashion.
>
> The only potential issue with this approach is that at the point that
> the map operation is performed the device that is going to be doing
> the IO may not yet be known (for example for network transmit we need
> to do the map operation before we can inspect the packet header and
> determine the destination interface). In most situations, it probably
> makes sense for all devices under control by the same driver domain to
> share the same pagetable structure, so this is not an issue. If this
> is not the case, mapping can be deferred to the kernel's DMA mapping
> functions, but there is likely to be less batching to amortize the
> hypercall cost.
>
>
> notion of xen heap pages and separate domain pages'. The former may
> be accessed by Xen rapidly in any context, whereas domain pages must
> be mapped dynamically on demand. On x86\_64 this distinction is
> redundant as Xen has a 1:1 mapping of all physical memory, and hence
> domain pages may be accessed efficiently. However, the current x86\_64
> code inherits the statically sized heap from 32b xen. As an immediate
> fix, this heap is arguably too small for a large x86\_64 machine, and
> limits the number of VMs that can be started (the limit is lower than
> on 32b as the domain structure for VMs is larger on 64b builds). A
> better solution might be to unify the xen and domain heaps on 64b
> builds.
>
>
> IBM have led the excellent work to add fine-grained access control
> mechanisms to Xen's low-level interfaces. However, the current dom0
> control interface has a very simple flat' notion of privilege, and
> extending this to allow more flexible delegation of control over
> guests would certainly be desirable for some deployment scenarios.
>
> Today, there already exists a notion of a bitmap of privilege
> capabilities that a guest has. (Note that this is orthogonal to the
> sets of physical resources it has control over such as ranges of
> machine address space, io ports etc). The current capability set is
> rather small, and could no doubt be made more fine grained.
>
>
> More interestingly, it would be useful to be able to delegate
> privilege such as to be able to grant a domain permission to perform a
> certain privileged operation on some specified other domain or group
> of domains. This leads naturally to a hierarchical model of
> domain resource allocation and permission, for example allowing a
> domain with only a very restricted privilege capability to create a
> new domain by carving it out of its own resource allocation. It would
> then have full control over this domain, allowing it to destroy it,
> pause it, map its pages, attach a debugger etc.
>
> >From Xen's low-level datapath' point of view we want to flatten this
>
> hierarchy to keep the privilege check operations as simple as
> possible, with only the control operations having to worry about the
> extra complexity. Citing the example in the previous paragraph of
> having one domain build another, this should be quite achievable as
> some care is already taken to have the domain builder use standard
> unprivileged interfaces.
>
>
> \section{Testing and Debugging}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> Users require Xen to be a rock-solid stable system component,
> achieving greater stability than the OSes which run on it. Generally,
> we don't do too badly on this front. We're fortunate to have a
> relatively small and tight code base, coupled with significant
> investment in testing by a number of parties.
>
> The tip of the -unstable tree is exercised daily by IBM, Intel and
> VirtualIron as well as XenSource. The XenSource test reports are
> viewable on the web at http://xenbits.xensource.com/xenrt, while other
> reports go to the xen-devel list. The continuous testing provides a
> good way of monitoring the progress toward stability of new features,
> and for flagging regressions.
>
> In fact, most potential regressions never make it out into the
> -unstable tree, as they are picked up by automated testing in the
> staging tree, which gives changesets a grilling on three different
> machines (32b, PAE, and x86\_64) before pushing the changesets out to
> -unstable. Hard-core developers wanting to see checkins as soon as
> they happen can do so by subscribing to xen-staging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Prior to the 3.0 release we released a special testing CD and
> the results. The CD provided booted a native Linux kernel followed by
> 32b, PAE and x86\_64 kernels (as appropriate for the hardware), running
> a whole series of tests and benchmarks under each and recording the
> results to a log file which was then uploaded. The test CD proved very
> useful identifying machines Xen struggled on, and helped us get many
> of the issues fixed prior to release. Post release, the 3.0 demo CD
> has proved useful in debugging various platform issues reported by
> users, enabling them to collect and supply developers with data from
> both native and xen kernel boots.
>
> One avenue we are investigating to help find bugs is submitting Xen to
> the OSS code scanning programme run by Coverity with funding from
> DARPA. Coverity's tools have proved useful in finding bugs in a number
> of other kernel-level projects, so it makes sense to investigate. The
> tool will likely generate a long list of possible issues, which will
> require a concerted effort from the community to investigate and
> classify, and fix the subset that are real bugs.
>
> Even with the best possible test and QA programme, some number of
> in-field crashes will be sadly inevitable. In these circumstances,
> it's important that developers can gather as much information as
> possible from the incident. For user-space incidents, xen-bugtool' is
> useful for collecting log files and system details. For more serious
> failures of domain 0 or xen itself we can't rely on things getting
> logged in standard files, and need support for taking a system core
> dump. Horms is doing great work to get kexec working in domain 0,
> meaning that we will be able to use kdump to write out a system core.
>
> Dumping a full copy of system memory can be quite time consuming on a
> machine with lots of RAM, so we will possibly have to consider putting
> a little more intelligence in the dump routines to harvest the most
> useful information e.g. a quick dump that concentrates on CPU register
> state and stack information for xen and dom0, and a more comprehensive
> dump that collects all xen and dom0 state and just register and stack
> info for other guests. We certainly need tools to help pick apart
> these dumps and turn them into a form that gdb can load to assist
> examination.
>
> For xen developers there are a number of debugging aids that can
> called on. There is a serial gdb stub that can be connected to
> remotely and used to examine both xen and domain 0. Since this halts
> the system while the debugger is connected, it typically can't be used
> on production systems. One frequently useful tool is the debug
> console, which by default is accessed by hitting ctrl-A three times on
> the serial console. Hitting h' gives a help menu of features the
> console can perform. It's main use is for diagnosing the state of the
> system in event of a hang. Register dumps can be used to see what all
> the CPUs are doing, whether guests are servicing interrupts etc. The
> other
> statistics.
>
> Debugging guest VMs can be achieved using Xen's gdbserver support.
> When gdbserver is started in dom0 against a particular VM, it
> effectively implements gdb serial stub functionality on behalf of the
> guest, enabling gdb to connect to the gdbserver via a TCP
> port. gdbserver has recently been extended to support both PV and HVM
> guests. If getting register and stack state for all the VCPUs from a
> guest is all that's required, the xenctx' command is quicker than
> firing up gdb.
>
> When guest VMs crash we currently have the option to preserve the VM,
> enabling debugging via gdb or xenctx. However, it would be useful to
> have the option to write out a core image of the guest VM. This is not
> quite the same as doing a VM save-to-disk operation, as we would like
> to write the image out in a form that gdb could then inspect. The old
> xen 1.2 tools had basic guest core dump support, and it would be good
> to see this feature back in Xen 3.
>
>
>
> \section{Misc}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> We need to add a hypercall to xen to allow a guest to extend the size
> of it's grant table. This should be straightforward, but in its
> current absence is the restriction which leads to the current max 3
> VIF's per guest'' limit. Actually, this restriction could also be
> solved by making the allocation of grant table entries to a VIF
> dynamic, as already happens with the blkfront driver. We should
> implement both strategies forthwith.
>
>
> It would be useful to add PV extensions to guests to assist in taking
> consistent filesystem snapshots, for example, when creating template
> VMs''. The obvious way of doing this would be to extend the xenbus
> mechanism used to deliver shutdown requests and magic sysrq'
> operations. Adding the ability to issue sync disks and pause'' and
> remount filesystems read-only and pause'' would be useful.
>
>
> We need to make a few simple extensions to the control API to allow
> the set of CPU feature flags exposed to a guest VM (both HVM and PV)
> to be cooked'' such that features may be hidden. This is useful in a
> heterogenous CPU environment where it may be desirable to only allow
> guests to see a lowest common denominator set of flags such that
> save/restore/relocate images remain portable.
>
>
> The linux guest code currently implements a strict priority ordering
> over how it services pending event channels. We may wish to replace
> this with a scheme that uses round-robin servicing of events within
> each group of 32 event channels, thus providing a hybrid approach that
> supports both prioritization and fairness. This is purely a guest
> issue, and the current strict priority scheme doesn't seem to cause
> any problems today.
>
>
> Currently, each PV guest is allowed just a single virtual serial
> console device. Although once we have PV framebuffer support (and
> associated virtual terminals) virtual serial console support will be
> less important, it would still be nice to support multiple consoles
> per guest. This should be relatively straight forward, requiring
> updates to the console frontend driver, xenconsoled, and the tools.
>
>
> When using xm mem-set' commands to control the amount of memory in a
> guest its currently quite easy to set the target too low and create a
> memory crunch' that causes a linux guest kernel to run the infamous
> oomkiller' and hence render the system unstable.  It would be far
> better if the interaction between the balloon driver and linux's
> memory manager was more forgiving, hence causing the balloon driver to
> back off', or ask for more memory back from xen to alleviate the
> pressure (up to the current mem-max' limit). The hard part here is
> deciding what in the memory management system to trigger off -- at the
> point where the oom killer runs the system is typically already
> unusable, so we want to be able to get in there earlier. Seeking
>
> When PV guests boot, the kernel and initial ram disk images must be
> supplied to the domain builder. This is not unlike what happens when a
> physical machine boots using PXE. However, from a maintenance point of
> view it is very convenient to store the kernel and initrd in the guest
> virtual disk image, where it can be kept in-sync with its kernel
> modules. This has led to a couple of different schemes to read the
> kernel and initrd from out of the guest filesystem as part of the PV
> guest domain building process. pygrub uses libext2/libreiser to read
> the images out of the guest filesystem, whereas domUloader mounts the
> guest filesystem in dom0 to extract the files. The latter suffers from
> potential security issues in the presence of maliciously crafted
> filesystem images, but is otherwise simpler to set up.
>
> A better solution to this problem would be to use a bootloader run
> within the guest domain. This could be done using a cut-down linux
> instance that kexec's the final guest kernel, or by porting a
> bootloader such as grub to be able to use the PV net/block
> devices. Grub2 has quite wide filesystem support and is considerably
> easier to work on than the old grub code, so adding these drivers may
> not be that difficult. Grub supports a wide range of filesystems,
> including UFS that used by Solaris. [NB: is UFS supported in Grub2?]
>
> The save/restore/relocate in Xen provides almost all we need to be
> able to take copy-on-write snapshots of VM's memory, to be used for
> rollback or to checkpoint long running jobs (if the guest is
> communicating with other machines then the wider effect of such a
> rollback must be considered). To be able to support checkpoints, we
> need to extend the tools to coordinate snapshotting of virtual disks
> with taking the execution state snapshot. As well as enabling such
> checkpoints to be initiated from the control tools, perhaps providing
> the ability to trigger them from within the guest would be useful too.
> A natural progression from supporting checkpointing would be to
> enable VM forking''. Rather than creating a read-only checkpoint,
> the VM effectively becomes cloned, running in a different domain,
> writing to a CoW snapshot of the disk. For VMs that have network
> access a mechanism is needed for enabling the IP configuration of the
> guest to be updated for the cloned VM. It should be possible to add
> code in the PV resume' path to change the IP address and update
> listening sockets while closing open connections.
>
> Xen currently lacks support for devices that require ISA DMA (DMA
> below 16MB). Although ISA devices are rare these days, some PCMCIA
> cards have the same restriction (particularly older WLAN cards),
> creating problems for some laptops. We need to assess whether adding
> such support is going to be worth the effort or not.
>
> Adding support for call graph support into xen oprofile would be
> useful. This would involve capturing the first few items on the stack
> as well the EIP (though there would be issues when frame pointers are
> missing).
>
> Hardware performance counters are currently considered to be
> system-wide, which works great for xen oprofile, but prevents guests
> from profiling themselves. Adding support to allow performance
> counters to be efficiently contexted switched between domains would be
> useful (though use in this manner would be mutually exclusive with
> system-wide use).
>
> Although efforts are made to ensure the security of the xen hypercall
> API, it wouldn't hurt to do a complete code audit: it is critical that
> unprivilged guests should not be able to access data that doesn't
> belong to them, or crash the system. Efforts should be made to bound
> the scope of 'denial of quality of service' attacks too.
>
> A useful tool to help test the integrity of the xen guest API would be
> a xen equivalent of the 'crashme' tool used for testing the Linux
> process API. The tool would attempt to upset Xen by operating like a
> normal guest but using random numbers to perturb hypercall arguments,
> make 'difficult' corruptions to pagetables and other structures etc.
> (e.g. mutually recusrsive pagetables would be ain interesting one).
>
> Finally, its about time we did another iteration on the user manual,
> wiki and other documentation to ensure its up to date and relevant.
>
>
> \section{The IA64 ports}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> %[insert info supplied by maintainers]
>
> The IA64 port is making excellent progress with contributions from HP,
> Intel, Fujitsu, Bull and VALinux to name but a few.  Base performance
> is currently excellent, incurring an typical overhead of around 2\% on
> native. Multiple Linux domains are supported (including support for
> virtual SMP), and clean shutdown has been completed. In addition the
> source code has been reorganized to produce a clean abstraction layer
> at the source level; with this patch applied, the resulting kernel
> binary can be run both under Xen and on bare metal.
>
>
> Xen/ia64 is also getting close to feature parity with the x86
> ports. Virtual block device using the standard backend/frontend
> model has been integrated, and the same set of control tools
> and commands are used to manage the system.
>
> There is also support for VT-i --- the hardware virtualization
> e-technology for IPF --- which allows the running of completely
> unmodified guest operating systems along-side paravirtualized
> domains. Once again, the control tool set has been aligned with
> the VT-x model to maximize compatibility.
>
> In terms of hardware compatibility, it has been extensively
> tested to operate on the following configurations:
> \begin{itemize}
> \item Intel Tiger4
> \item HP rx2600/rx1600/rx2620 (and likely any HP zx1 based system)
> \item Bull NovaScale 4000 and 6000 systems, with 5000 to follow
> \item Fujitsu Primequest series
> \end{itemize}
>
> In terms of future work, the main areas are:
> \begin{enumerate}
>   \item Completing/stabilizing the work to give each guest a
>   \item Implementing save/restore and migration;
>   \item Providing support for driver domains; and
>   \item Additional stability / performance testing and improvements.
> \end{enumerate}
>
>
> \section{The PowerPC Port}
>
> The PowerPC work, led by IBM, is focusing on the PowerPC 970 processor
> which includes hardware extensions designed to support paravirtualized
> at getting Xen running on 970s with hypervisor mode disabled (e.g.\
> Apple G5 systems).
>
> The port doesn't use the standard split driver model yet, but
> is running guests. We hope that the code can get
> merged into -unstable in the next couple of months; various changes to
> support this forthcoming merge have already been incorporated (e.g.
> the use of {\tt copy\_from\_guest()} which on PowerPC uses
> physically addressed scatter/gather lists). Further changes to common
> code will also be required, which may modify the dom0 API, and so
> we need to ensure that people have advance warning before any such
> changes go in.
>
> Power Xen currently only runs on the Maple 970 processor evaluation
> board, but support for IBM JS21 blades and other 970-based machines
>
>
> \section{Aims for next two releases}
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> \subsection{3.0.3 aims; end July to synchronize with FC6 freeze}
> \begin{itemize}
>  \item new CPU scheduler
>  \item cow file-backed virtual hard disk support
>  \item qemu-dm updated to latest qemu version, stored as patch queue
>  \item basic NUMA memory allocator support
>  \item kexec support
>  \item xend VM life-cycle management
>  \item new shadow pagetable code?
> \end{itemize}
>
> \subsection{3.0.4 aims; end Sept}
> \begin{itemize}
>  \item new xml-rpc control API
>  \item simple storage management in xend
>  \item qemu v2e' integration
>  \item PV network virtualization improvements
>  \item PPC merge?
>  \item PV USB support ?
> \end{itemize}
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
>
> {\em Schedule:}        \\
> 1 - 3.0.3: end July    \\
> 2 - 3.0.4: end Q3 2006 \\
> 3 - Q4 2006/Q1 2007    \\
> 4 - beyond             \\
>
> These priority ratings indicate where various features could be
> targeted to land on the roadmap. It reflects where the xen core team
> is planning on concentrating its effort, coupled with input from work
> that we already know is happening in the community. Obviously other
> folk will have different ideas of priority and will scratch their own
> itch and submit patches. We should obviously try to iterate in order
> to get such patches included ASAP, regardless of the below suggested
> schedule.
>
> \small
>
> \begin{tabular}{|l|l|p{10cm}|}
> \hline
>
> Sched & Area  & Description
> \\
>
> \hline
>
> 1     & tools         & xend VM life-cycle management
> \\
> 1/2   & tools         & XML config file and conversion tools
> \\
> 1/2   & tools         & standardized xen control API: xml-rpc over
> https/unixdomain sockets              \\
> 1/2   & tools         & C++/perl/python bindings for control API
> \\
> 2     & tools         & simple storage management in xend
> \\
> 3     & tools         & revive guest coredump support
> \\
> 3     & tools         & split VM relocation operation into two parts
> and authenticate                      \\
> 3     & tools         & DMTF CIM providers
> \\
> 3/4   & tools         & Web GUI for Xen
> \\
>
> \hline
>
> 1     & storage       & blktap (or other) support for file-based
> virtual disk storage. \\
> 2     & storage       & blktap plugins for common formats
> \\
> 2     & storage       & optimized qcow implementation
> \\
> 3     & storage       & consider adding write accounting/throttling on
> current loop driver           \\
> 3     & storage       & support for block IO QoS. Use CFQ and ionice,
> or implement in blkback?      \\
> 3/4   & storage       & 'ioctl' support between blkfront/back
> \\
> 3/4   & storage       & media change, size change event propagation to
> guest userspace               \\
> 4     & storage       & consider SCSI level storage virtualization
> option                                \\
>
> \hline
>
> 1/2   & network       & TCP Segmentation Offload support in device
> channel                               \\
> 2     & network       & checksum offload cleanup
> \\
>
> 2     & network       & hypervisor chooses to copy vs. page flip
> \\
> 2     & network       & dynamic allocation of grant table entries;
> grant table resize
> \\
> 2     & network       & investigate whether bridge code needs to be
> 'streamlined'                 \\
> 2     & network       & jumbo frames support in dom0 and device
> channel                               \\
> 3/4   & network       & investigate static shared buffer approach
> \\
> 3/4   & network       & TCP Offload Engine support in device channel
> \\
> 3/4   & network       & investigate high-performance point-to-point
> 4     & network       & RDMA support in device channel
> \\
> \hline
>
> 1     & xen           & extensive benchmarking and perf tuning
> \\
> 1     & xen           & CPU scheduler that balances VCPUs, implements
> weight \& caps                \\
> 1/2   & xen           & initial NUMA mechanism checkin
> \\
> 2     & xen           & live relocation tuning, robustification, tools
> safety interlock              \\
> 2/3   & xen           & support for running 32b PAE guests on a 64b
> hypervisor                    \\
> 2/3   & xen           & improved NUMA policy code
> \\
> 2/3   & xen           & add order$>$0 guest memory allocation
> accounting                            \\
> 2/3   & xen           & extend x86\_64 heap size; merge xen and domain
> pools                         \\
> 3     & xen           & investigate bad pre-emption
> avoidance/mitigation strategies                       \\
> 3     & xen           & add superpage support for PV guests
> \\
> 3     & xen           & IOMMU support: isolation of devices to
> domains; grant table integration      \\
> 3/4   & xen           & lazy memory allocation for live relocation of
> ballooned guests              \\
> 4     & xen           & fine-grained delegation for dom0ops;
> hierarchical resource model           \\
> 4     & xen           & power management enhancements: CPU sleep, freq
> scaling                       \\
> 4     & xen           & power management enhancements:
> suspend/hibernate                             \\
> 4     & xen           & accounting and billing time IO domains spend
> on behalf of guests           \\
>
> \hline
>
> \end{tabular}
>
> \begin{tabular}{|l|l|p{10cm}|}
>
> \hline
>
> Sched & Area  & Description
> \\
>
> \hline
>
>
> PAE-on-PAE mode, SMP safety           \\
> 1     & hvm           & upgrade QEMU version, maintain as a patch
> queue                         \\
> 1/2   & hvm           & rewrite shadow pagetable code to optimize,
> simplify                              \\
> 1/2   & hvm           & finalize interface for making hypercalls from
> VT guests                     \\
> 2     & hvm           & HVM save/restore support; qemu, xen, and tools
> changes                       \\
> 2     & hvm           & basic SMP HVM guest support; ACPI tables,
> locking safety                        \\
> 2/3   & hvm           & change QEMU-xen interface to use the 'v2e'
> approach                              \\
> 2/3   & hvm           & SMP HVM guest performance and scalability
> \\
> 2/3   & hvm           & support real superpage mappings for HVM guests
> 2/3   & hvm           & implement high-performance SCSI HBA emulation
> \\
> 2/3   & hvm           & implement high-performance Ethernet emulation
> \\
> 3     & hvm           & live relocation. Add log-dirty support
> \\
> 3     & hvm           & move QEMU into a 'stub domain' linked against
> a linux kernel                        \\
> 3/4   & hvm           & move QEMU into a 'stub domain' linked against
> a minios                      \\
> 4     & hvm           & HVM hotplug CPU emulation
> \\
>
> \hline
>
> 1     & linux         & extensive benchmarking and perf tuning
> \\
> 1/2   & linux         & SMP scalability improvements
> \\
> 1/2   & linux         & work to get xen in to kernel.org linux
> \\
> 2     & linux         & code review of x86\_64 port
> \\
> 2     & linux         & investigate proposed x86\_64 optimizations
> \\
> 2     & linux         & improve interaction between balloon driver and
> page allocator to avoid memory crunch\\
> 2/3   & linux         & support for multiple virtual serial consoles
> \\
> 3     & linux         & consider hybrid round-robin/priority scheme to
> service event channels                \\
>
> \hline
>
> 1/2   & client        & basic kernel fbdev paravirtual framebuffer
> implementation                        \\
> 2/3   & client        & USB virtualization; investigate USB-over-IP
> code                          \\
> 2/3   & client        & Xserver support for 'h/w cursor', copy rect
> and fill rect                 \\
> 3/4   & client        & OpenGL/Direct3D virtualization
> \\
>
> \hline
>
> 2/3   & misc          & support for dom0 kexec/kdump to get a machine
> core                          \\
> 3     & misc          & infiniband direct guest IO support (finalize
> interface, merge xen-smartio.hg)      \\
> 3     & misc          & support for hiding CPU feature flags from
> guests (PV and HVM)                   \\
> 3/4   & misc          & smart NIC direct guest IO support
> \\
> 3/4   & misc          & submit xen for scanning by Coverity tool;
> investigate warnings flagged  \\
> 3/4   & misc          & tools support for doing auto CPU/memory
> resource allocation across VMs        \\
> 3/4   & misc          & support to checkpoint/rollback guests
> \\
> 4     & misc          & port Grub2 bootloader to net/blockfront
> devices                               \\
> 4     & misc          & investigate 'pluggable driver architecture'
> \\
> 4     & misc          & xenfs filesystem-level virtualization; shared
> buffer cache                  \\
> 4     & misc          & do we need support for ISA/PCMCIA DMA (below
> 16MB)?                                \\
> \hline
> \end{tabular}
>
> \end{document}

--
Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat?  And no pedals!
Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
Mark: My wheel has a wheel!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



• Follow-Ups:

 Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.