|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] [Fwd: stack overflow "cause" found]
Rik van Riel wrote: > Ian Pratt wrote: >>>> Xen really should not be doing this. We could either uninline >>>> some of these functions, or try gcc -O2 or gcc -Os. >>> OK, with -Os it doesn't quite build due to the built-ins not being >>> inlined. With -O2 the stack usage changes dramatically... >> >> It would be nice if -O2 worked. Quite a scary change give the amount >> of inline asm though... > > Not only does -O2 seem to work, but without it we get stack > overflows and things suddenly stop working. > > I've been beating up my x86-64 system with a few VT and paravirt > guests for over an hour now, and it no longer crashes. Without > -O2, I can make it crash within minutes... Good news. We've been doing stress testings, and haven't seen major problems so far. Jun --- Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |