[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xend: Add multiple cpumasks support
* Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-08-14 17:41]: > > > Either Keir's cpu[X] = "Y" approach or my cpu = [ "A","B","C" ] > approach > > > seem workable. > > > > Your last email seemed to indicate to me that you didn't like using > > quoted values in a list to separate per-vcpu cpumask values. Maybe I > > was mistaken. > > If it's an honest python list I have no problem. Your example appeared > to be some quoting within a string. OK. > My approach is a list too... > > > > BTW: does the right thing happen in the face of vcpu hot plugging? > i.e. > > > if I unplug a vcpu and put it back in do I keep the old mask? If I > add > > > vcpus what mask do they get? > > > > unplug events only affect a vcpu's status. The internal struct > > vcpu in the hypervisor is not de-allocated/re-allocated during hotplug > > events. > > > > We don't currently support a hotadd for vcpus that weren't allocated > at > > domain creation time. The current method for simulating hot-add would > > be to start a domain with 32 VCPUS and disable all by the number of > > vcpus you currently want. Ryan Grimm posted a patch back in February > > that had xend do this by adding a new config option, max_vcpus, which > > was used when calling xc_domain_max_vcpus() having the hypervisor > alloc > > that max number of vcpus and then using the vcpus parameter to > determine > > how many to bring online. > > I like the idea of having a vcpus_max I'll see if Ryan Grimm can dust that one off and resend it. -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx (512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253 ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |