[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?


  • To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:07:44 +0800
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:09:02 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Aca9yABevSNKoKxKQoeZHIOaybJ/twALEKfOAAuHctAAJFLMkAA1uYtQAAY5wukAV7GSUA==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?

>
>Looks like it could be a 32-on-64 issue if you're running 64-bit Xen.
>Perhaps the current test for this situation, in hvm_do_hypercall() in
>arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c, is broken. It just tests 
>guest_paging_levels, but that
>may not work if paging is disabled. That's probably where you 
>should look if
>you're trying to debug this.

This patch fixes the HVM hypercall issue when paging is not enabled yet
on 64bit host.

Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: fix_hvm_hypercall.patch
Description: fix_hvm_hypercall.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.