[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code


  • To: "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Yu, Ping Y" <ping.y.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:05:00 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:05:46 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcbBIENkZs6MKaOlRd24QY0O0VbHigA3TjWA
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code

Tim,

I tested this new patch in x86_64 mode, and here is the result for your 
reference.

(1)pae=0 UP IA32 VMX    Pass
(2)pae=1 UP IA32 VMX  Pass
(3)pae=0 UP IA32e  VMX  Complains "Your CPU does not support long mode. Use a 
32bit disribution."
(4)pae=1 UP IA32e VMX  VMX is destroyed automatically 

The VMX's image is RHEL4U1.

Ping

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Deegan
>Sent: 2006年8月16日 18:35
>To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code
>
>A new version of the shadow2 patch is now available at
>http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~tjd21/shadow2.patch
>(md5: 3a094d3eebf328db887f495c022bf651)
>This patch applies to version 0e32095a7b46 of -unstable.
>
>It should fix the issues that have been seen with memory allocation and
>with 64-bit HVM guests.  SMP HVM guests may still have some problems.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Tim.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.