[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] kexec: Reserve hypercall number
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:11:12PM +0900, Horms wrote: > Hi, > > this patch reserves a hypercall number for kexec, > to ensure that it isn't a moving target. I notice that since I sent this patch two new hypercall numbers have been added, __HYPERVISOR_sysctl and __HYPERVISOR_domctl, but this patch remains neither merged nor nacked. Is reserving a hypercall number for kexec acceptable? > kexec: Reserve hypercall number > > This is a micro-excerpt from the kexec patches that > are being worked on. It just reserves hypercall number 35 > ensure that is isn't a moving target. > > Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- 0001/xen/include/public/xen.h > +++ work/xen/include/public/xen.h 2006-08-21 13:06:15.000000000 +0900 > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ > #define __HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op 32 > #define __HYPERVISOR_physdev_op 33 > #define __HYPERVISOR_hvm_op 34 > +#define __HYPERVISOR_kexec_op 35 > > /* Architecture-specific hypercall definitions. */ > #define __HYPERVISOR_arch_0 48 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |