[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] xenconsoled CPU denial of service problem


  • To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:13:48 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:14:41 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcbMYAnNSJUYvjhTEdux/QAKle7CWA==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] xenconsoled CPU denial of service problem



On 29/8/06 4:59 pm, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Finaly question - in the handle_ring_read() method is the port returned
> by xc_evtchn_pending guarrenteed to be same as port we already have a
> reference to in 'struct domain' local_port field ? If so I can remove
> the saved reference 'limited_port' I added in 'struct buffer'

Yes, that is guaranteed.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.