[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [PV-ON-HVM] Don't generate lots ofspurious interrupts when using event
> This does solve the problem, however it adds unnecessary overhead > (one more trap into xen at the end of each event handler). IMO, the real > cause should be in pic_intack, where pending irr is converted into isr. I'm inclined to agree here. The patch I checked in certainly wasn't very pretty, and this is the best alternative I've heard so far. However, it looks like it's actually slower than what we've got at the moment: NPtcp between dom0 and domU on my test box reports a latency and maximum bandwidth of 36.42us and 1961.58Mbps without this patch, or 45.94us and 1874.69Mbps with. All measurements are best-of-three. Looking at the patch, it ought to have been slightly faster, so these results rather surprised me. Did you do any benchmarks yourself? Steven. Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |